Up in the clouds: A Taxonomical Analysis of Network Management Functionalities from a Network as a Service Perspective

The externalization of network control and maintenance tasks, enabled by the emerging Networking as a Service (NaaS) paradigm, is an appealing opportunity for large Telcos to expand their network management offering to SMEs. In this paper we propose an architecture for network control and management capable of efficiently supporting the NaaS paradigm. Our methodology is based on a set of orthogonal requirements that forms the platform to assess the admissibility of different network management functions in the remote management plane. Such assessments are realized based on the taxonomical evaluation of the management functions classified according to the requirements they impose on the remote management plane in terms of security and robustness. Experimental results obtained from a proof-of-concept implementation deployed over a large scale testbed composed of about 500 WiFi Access Points shows that the signaling traffic for a practical implementation supporting not trivial autonomic control loops is lower that 20 bytes/s for each node. Moreover, the latency to execute administrative actions is in most cases in the order of 70 ms.

[1]  Paul Francis,et al.  CONMan: a step towards network manageability , 2007, SIGCOMM.

[2]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  Detailed diagnosis in enterprise networks , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[3]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  MDG: measurement-driven guidelines for 802.11 WLAN design , 2007, MobiCom '07.

[4]  Tal Garfinkel,et al.  SANE: A Protection Architecture for Enterprise Networks , 2006, USENIX Security Symposium.

[5]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  SMARTA: a self-managing architecture for thin access points , 2006, CoNEXT '06.

[6]  Thomas E. Anderson,et al.  ETTM: A Scalable Fault Tolerant Network Manager , 2011, NSDI.

[7]  Geoffrey M. Voelker,et al.  NetPrints: Diagnosing Home Network Misconfigurations Using Shared Knowledge , 2009, NSDI.

[8]  Nick McKeown,et al.  OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks , 2008, CCRV.

[9]  David D. Clark,et al.  Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's Internet , 2002, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[10]  S. Latre,et al.  A hierarchical approach to autonomic network management , 2010, 2010 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops.

[11]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Principled design of the modern Web architecture , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[12]  David D. Clark,et al.  Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's internet , 2005, TNET.

[13]  Alec Wolman,et al.  Dyson: An Architecture for Extensible Wireless LANs , 2010, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[14]  Roberto Riggio,et al.  A distributed network monitoring framework for wireless networks , 2011, 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops.

[15]  Alec Wolman,et al.  Designing High Performance Enterprise Wi-Fi Networks , 2008, NSDI.

[16]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Routing as a Service , 2006 .

[17]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  CENTAUR: realizing the full potential of centralized wlans through a hybrid data path , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[18]  Hong Yan,et al.  A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management , 2005, CCRV.

[19]  Simon N. Foley,et al.  Challenges for federated, autonomic network management in the Future Internet , 2009, 2009 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management-Workshops.

[20]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  DIRAC: a software-based wireless router system , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[21]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  Paxos Made Simple , 2001 .

[22]  Hong Yan,et al.  Tesseract: A 4D Network Control Plane , 2007, NSDI.

[23]  Martín Casado,et al.  Ethane: taking control of the enterprise , 2007, SIGCOMM '07.

[24]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Unraveling the Complexity of Network Management , 2009, NSDI.