Comparison of In Vivo and Ex Vivo MRI of the Human Hippocampal Formation in the Same Subjects

Abstract Multiple techniques for quantification of hippocampal subfields from in vivo MRI have been proposed. Linking in vivo MRI to the underlying histology can help validate and improve these techniques. High‐resolution ex vivo MRI can provide an intermediate modality to map information between these very different imaging modalities. This article evaluates the ability to match information between in vivo and ex vivo MRI in the same subjects. We perform rigid and deformable registration on 10 pairs of in vivo (3 T, 0.4 × 0.4 × 2.6 mm3) and ex vivo (9.4 T, 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm3) scans, and describe differences in MRI appearance between these modalities qualitatively and quantitatively. The feasibility of using this dataset to validate in vivo segmentation is evaluated by applying an automatic hippocampal subfield segmentation technique (ASHS) to in vivo scans and comparing SRLM (stratum/radiatum/lacunosum/moleculare) surface to manual tracing on corresponding ex vivo scans (and in 2 cases, histology). Regional increases in thickness are detected in ex vivo scans adjacent to the ventricles and were not related to scanner, resolution differences, or susceptibility artefacts. Satisfactory in vivo/ex vivo registration and subvoxel accuracy of ASHS segmentation of hippocampal SRLM demonstrate the feasibility of using this dataset for validation, and potentially, improvement of in vivo segmentation methods.

[1]  A. MouritzenDam Shrinkage of the brain during histological procedures with fixation in formaldehyde solutions of different concentrations. , 1979 .

[2]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Shape-Based Alignment of Hippocampal Subfields: Evaluation in Postmortem MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[3]  H W Blume,et al.  Connections of the hippocampal formation in humans: II. The endfolial fiber pathway , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  A. Toga,et al.  Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis of Sulcal Variability in the Human Brain , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H Maxeiner,et al.  Intracranial volume, brain volume, reserve volume and morphological signs of increased intracranial pressure--a post-mortem analysis. , 2008, Legal medicine.

[6]  Menno P. Witter,et al.  A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Histology-derived volumetric annotation of the human hippocampal subfields in postmortem MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Predicting the location of human perirhinal cortex, Brodmann's area 35, from MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Murray Grossman,et al.  A platform for discovery: The University of Pennsylvania Integrated Neurodegenerative Disease Biobank , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[11]  P. Hof,et al.  Cytoarchitecture of the human cerebral cortex: MR microscopy of excised specimens at 9.4 Tesla. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  Brenda Milner,et al.  The medial temporal-lobe amnesic syndrome. , 2005, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[13]  G. Skibo,et al.  Structural Features of Ischemic Damage in the Hippocampus , 2009, Anatomical record.

[14]  H. Duvernoy The Human Hippocampus , 1988, J.F. Bergmann-Verlag.

[15]  Takaaki Hosoya,et al.  Morphology of the inner structure of the hippocampal formation in Alzheimer disease. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[17]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[18]  M. Mallar Chakravarty,et al.  Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: Towards a harmonized segmentation protocol , 2015, NeuroImage.

[19]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Automatic Clustering and Thickness Measurement of Anatomical Variants of the Human Perirhinal Cortex , 2014, MICCAI.

[21]  B. Pappas,et al.  Chronic cerebrovascular insufficiency induces dementia-like deficits in aged rats , 1992, Brain Research.

[22]  Xia Li,et al.  Enhancement of histological volumes through averaging and their use for the analysis of magnetic resonance images. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  P. Yushkevich,et al.  Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Maik Stille,et al.  3D reconstruction of 2D fluorescence histology images and registration with in vivo MR images: Application in a rodent stroke model , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Nick C. Fox,et al.  A meta-analysis of hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer's disease , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[28]  Johan H C Reiber,et al.  Automated Segmentation of in Vivo and Ex Vivo Mouse Brain Magnetic Resonance Images , 2009, Molecular imaging.

[29]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2006, Science.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BigBrain: An Ultrahigh-Resolution 3D Human Brain Model , 2013, Science.

[31]  A. Sauter,et al.  Assessment of murine brain tissue shrinkage caused by different histological fixatives using magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging. , 2015, Histology and histopathology.

[32]  R. Coleman,et al.  Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.