Information Presentation in Decision and Risk Analysis: Answered, Partly Answered, and Unanswered Questions

For the last 30 years, researchers in risk analysis, decision analysis, and economics have consistently proven that decisionmakers employ different processes for evaluating and combining anticipated and actual losses, gains, delays, and surprises. Although rational models generally prescribe a consistent response, people's heuristic processes will sometimes lead them to be inconsistent in the way they respond to information presented in theoretically equivalent ways. We point out several promising future research directions by listing and detailing a series of answered, partly answered, and unanswered questions.

[1]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  John W. Payne,et al.  Life expectancy as a constructed belief: Evidence of a live-to or die-by framing effect , 2012 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[4]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Avoiding Regret in Decisions with Feedback: A Negotiation Example , 1995 .

[5]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[7]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Defaults and Donation Decisions , 2004, Transplantation.

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[9]  N. Liberman,et al.  Regulatory focus effects on discounting over uncertainty for losses vs. gains , 2008 .

[10]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Karen Lowrie,et al.  Ten Most Important Accomplishments in Risk Analysis, 1980–2010 , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[14]  A. Krishna,et al.  An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior , 2011 .

[15]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[16]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Behavioural issues in environmental modelling - The missing perspective , 2015, Environmental Modelling & Software.

[17]  Tianjun Feng,et al.  A further exploration of the uncertainty effect , 2013 .

[18]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Framing Effects in Narrative and Non‐Narrative Risk Messages , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[20]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[21]  I. Simonson,et al.  Attribute–Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals: , 1997 .

[22]  G. Loewenstein Frames of mind in intertemporal choice , 1988 .

[23]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[24]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[25]  How Do Information Ambiguity and Timing of Contextual Information Affect Managers ’ Goal Congruence in Making Investment Decisions in Good Times vs . Bad Times ? , 2005 .

[26]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Goals as Reference Points , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  B. Fasolo,et al.  Risk attitudes and personality traits predict perceptions of benefits and risks for medicinal products: a field study of European medical assessors. , 2015, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[28]  A. Drolet,et al.  Age-Related Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertisements , 2005 .

[29]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  The Effects of Problem Representation on the Sure-Thing and Substitution Principles , 1985 .

[30]  N. Epley,et al.  Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors , 2001, Psychological science.

[31]  L. R. Keller Decision research with descriptive, normative, and prescriptive purposes — Some comments , 1989 .

[32]  M. M. Johnson,et al.  Age differences in decision making: a process methodology for examining strategic information processing. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[33]  E. Vaughan,et al.  The Significance of Socioeconomic and Ethnic Diversity for the Risk Communication Process , 1995 .

[34]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  Managers' variance investigation decisions: an experimental examination of probabilistic and outcome ambiguity , 2001 .

[35]  E. Vaughan Chronic exposure to an environmental hazard: risk perceptions and self-protective behavior. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[36]  Daniel G Goldstein,et al.  Partitioning Default Effects: Why People Choose Not to Choose , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[37]  John W. Payne,et al.  Note-Further Tests of Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior , 1981 .

[38]  Lynn A Maguire,et al.  Managing Wildfire Events: Risk‐Based Decision Making Among a Group of Federal Fire Managers , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  George Wu,et al.  The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome , 2006 .

[40]  David M. Messick,et al.  A Reverse Outcome Bias: The Influence of Multiple Reference Points on the Evaluation of Outcomes and Decisions , 1995 .

[41]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Word count: 3998 Corresponding author: , 2022 .

[42]  N. Schwarz Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[43]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Lottery dependent utility , 1987 .

[45]  W. Sharpe,et al.  Choosing Outcomes Versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice , 2008 .

[46]  Michael Smithson,et al.  The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world , 2014 .

[47]  Brenda Nordenstam,et al.  The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups , 1991 .

[48]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  Reference-Dependent Consumption Plans , 2009 .

[49]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  The Effect of Inference Order and Experience-Related Knowledge on Diagnostic Conjunction Probabilities , 1994 .

[50]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  G. Laurent,et al.  Repeat Purchasing of New Automobiles by Older Consumers: Empirical Evidence and Interpretations , 2005 .

[52]  James M. Leonhardt,et al.  Avoiding the Risk of Responsibility by Seeking Uncertainty: Responsibility Aversion and Preference for Indirect Agency When Choosing for Others , 2011 .

[53]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[54]  E. Riggle,et al.  Age difference in political decision making: Strategies for evaluating political candidates , 1996 .

[55]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk , 2007, Science.

[56]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[58]  R. Dhar,et al.  Preference Fluency in Choice , 2007 .

[59]  L. Green,et al.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[61]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[62]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Predicting Frames , 1983 .

[63]  Christopher Y. Olivola,et al.  Doing Unto Future Selves As You Would Do Unto Others: Psychological Distance and Decision Making , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[64]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[65]  M. Strosberg,et al.  Presumed Consent and other Predictors of Cadaveric Organ Donation in Europe , 2003 .

[66]  R. Thaler,et al.  Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[67]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[68]  G. Dunton,et al.  Difficult socio-economic circumstances and the utilization of risk information: A study of Mexican agricultural workers in the USA , 2007 .

[69]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Social Discounting , 2006, Psychological science.

[71]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .

[72]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[73]  L. Thompson,et al.  Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts , 1989 .

[74]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[75]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[76]  Andrea C. Samson Psychological Distance , 2014 .

[77]  Andrew M. Parker,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.481 Decision-making Competence: External Validation through an Individual-differences Approach , 2005 .

[78]  J. Schreiber Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[79]  Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al.  When negative evidence increases confidence: change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute , 2002 .

[80]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[81]  P. Bromiley Looking at prospect theory , 2010 .

[82]  John W. Payne,et al.  Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior , 1980 .

[83]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[84]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[85]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Debiasing , 1982 .

[86]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  Paradoxes and violations of normative decision theory , 2010 .

[87]  Brian Wansink,et al.  Super Bowls: Serving Bowl Size and Food Consumption , 2005, JAMA.

[88]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[89]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[90]  Elaine Vaughan,et al.  Variability in the Framing of Risk Issues , 1992 .

[91]  Eric J. Arnould,et al.  Older Consumers' Disposition of Special Possessions , 2000 .

[92]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[93]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[94]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[95]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Effects of Fluency on Psychological Distance and Mental Construal (or Why New York Is a Large City, but New York Is a Civilized Jungle) , 2008, Psychological science.

[96]  B. Wansink,et al.  Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[97]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[98]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? , 2010, Psychological science.

[99]  M. Rabin,et al.  Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes , 2007 .

[100]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[101]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[102]  E. Weber,et al.  Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[103]  R. Thaler,et al.  Risk Aversion Or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments , 1999 .

[104]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[105]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[106]  How Do Information Ambiguity and Timing of Contextual Information Affect Managers’ Goal Congruence in Making Investment Decisions in Good Times vs. Bad Times? , 2005 .

[107]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2011 .