What You Can Scrape and What Is Right to Scrape: A Proposal for a Tool to Collect Public Facebook Data
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Daniela Richter,et al. Pseudonymization of patient identifiers for translational research , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.
[2] Jean Burgess,et al. The Politics of Twitter Data , 2013 .
[3] Cornelius Puschmann. An end to the wild west of social media research: a response to Axel Bruns , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.
[4] M. Williams,et al. Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation , 2017, Sociology.
[5] Casey Fiesler,et al. “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics , 2018 .
[6] D. Braun,et al. Put in the spotlight or largely ignored? Emphasis on the Spitzenkandidaten by political parties in their online campaigns for European elections , 2019 .
[7] E. Buchanan,et al. Internet Research Ethics , 2012 .
[8] T. Venturini,et al. “API-Based Research” or How can Digital Sociology and Journalism Studies Learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica Data Breach , 2019, Digital Journalism.
[9] Anders Olof Larsson,et al. Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook , 2016, New Media Soc..
[10] Rasha A. Abdulla,et al. Protest leadership in the age of social media , 2016 .
[11] Axel Bruns,et al. After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.
[12] Henning Müller,et al. Strategies for health data exchange for secondary, cross-institutional clinical research , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[13] Yaniv Erlich,et al. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[14] Yannis Panagis,et al. The Empire Strikes Back: Digital Control of Unfair Terms of Online Services , 2017 .
[15] M. Zimmer. “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.
[16] Marco Gonzalez,et al. Author's Personal Copy Social Networks Tastes, Ties, and Time: a New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com , 2022 .
[17] Paolo Torroni,et al. CLAUDETTE: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service , 2018, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[18] Alexander Halavais. Overcoming terms of service: a proposal for ethical distributed research , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.
[19] T. Baar,et al. Group Privacy in the Age of Big Data , 2017 .
[20] Deen Freelon. Computational Research in the Post-API Age , 2018, Political Communication.
[21] Dan Mercea,et al. The disinformation landscape and the lockdown of social platforms , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.
[22] Rasha A. Abdulla,et al. Facebook polls as proto-democratic instruments in the Egyptian revolution: The ‘We Are All Khaled Said’ Facebook page , 2018 .
[23] Marco Loos,et al. Wanted: a Bigger Stick. On Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts with Online Service Providers , 2016 .
[24] K. Crawford,et al. Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide , 2016, Big Data Soc..
[25] Michael Zimmer and Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda (eds), Internet Research Ethics for the Social Age: New Challenges, Cases, and Contexts , 2018, European Journal of Communication.
[26] Nicolae V. Dură,et al. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights , 1995, Essential Texts on Human Rights for the Police.
[27] G. King,et al. A New Model for Industry–Academic Partnerships , 2019, PS: Political Science & Politics.
[28] M. Strohmaier,et al. When populists become popular: comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties , 2017 .