The detection of direction-defined and speed-defined spatial contours: one mechanism or two?

It is now accepted that the visual system integrates local orientation information across space to define spatial contours [Vision Research 33 (1993) 173]. More recently, it has been shown that similar integration occurs for the direction of local motion signals, in different parts of the visual field, if they are aligned along the axis of a spatial contour [Vision Research 42 (2002) 653]. Here we ask whether similar spatial-linking rules hold for contours comprised of local elements that share only a common speed (but not direction), in the presence of background elements which collectively have the same mean speed as the contour but considerable random variation in the speeds of the individual elements. Furthermore we investigate the detection of spatial contours that are defined by a common speed that is different (both locally and globally) from that of the background elements. The results show that there is a significant, albeit relatively weak, speed-association field with preferential linking between spatially proximal elements that have similar speeds. Although a salient speed difference between the contour and the background elements enhances detection performance for motion-defined contours, it does so primarily via a different route to that of direction linking. We suggest that for motion-defined contours the Gestalt notions of "common fate" and "good continuity", that describe the parsing of local velocity information into objects, boundaries and contours, are mediated via separate underlying perceptual mechanisms.

[1]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Is global motion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals? , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Lund,et al.  Widespread periodic intrinsic connections in the tree shrew visual cortex. , 1982, Science.

[3]  S. McKee,et al.  Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[5]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Visual detection of motion , 1994 .

[6]  L. Stone,et al.  Speed tuning of motion segmentation and discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterised neurones in the cat visual cortex , 1979, Nature.

[8]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Gestalten of Today: Early Processing of Visual Contours and Surfaces , 1996 .

[9]  S P McKee,et al.  Stimulus configuration determines the detectability of motion signals in noise. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Rules for combining the outputs of local motion detectors to define simple contours , 2002, Vision Research.

[14]  ROBERT F. HESS,et al.  Integrating Contours Within and Through Depth , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  D. Field,et al.  Integration of contours: new insights , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. J. Field,et al.  Contour integration: new insights , 1999 .

[17]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.