A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection

Supplier selection is a multi-criterion decision making problem under uncertain environments. Hence, it is reasonable to hand the problem in fuzzy sets theory (FST) and Dempster Shafer theory of evidence (DST). In this paper, a new MCDM methodology, using FST and DST, based on the main idea of the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), is developed to deal with supplier selection problem. The basic probability assignments (BPA) can be determined by the distance to the ideal solution and the distance to the negative ideal solution. Dempster combination rule is used to combine all the criterion data to get the final scores of the alternatives in the systems. The final decision results can be drawn through the pignistic probability transformation. In traditional fuzzy TOPSIS method, the quantitative performance of criterion, such as crisp numbers, should be transformed into fuzzy numbers. The proposed method is more flexible due to the reason that the BPA can be determined without the transformation step in traditional fuzzy TOPSIS method. The performance of criterion can be represented as crisp number or fuzzy number according to the real situation in our proposed method. The numerical example about supplier selection is used to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method.

[1]  Catherine K. Murphy.  Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM , 1986 .

[3]  P. Smets.  Data fusion in the transferable belief model , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[4]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[5]  Deng Ju-Long,et al.  Control problems of grey systems , 1982 .

[6]  Ch.-Ch Chou.  The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers , 2003 .

[7]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[8]  Caroline M. Eastman,et al.  Response: Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications : Arnold Kaufmann and Madan M. Gupta, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985 , 1987, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[9]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  An expert system for multi-criteria decision making using Dempster Shafer theory , 2001, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[11]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Simulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationships , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  David L. Olson,et al.  A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation , 2008 .

[14]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[15]  Huan Neng Chiu,et al.  Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[16]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Supplier selection in a fuzzy group setting: A method using grey related analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Yi-Chung Hu,et al.  Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making in the determination of critical criteria for assessing service quality of travel websites , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[19]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  A method of aggregation in DS/AHP for group decision-making with the non-equivalent importance of individuals in the group , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Ronald R. Yager.  A knowledge-based approach to adversarial decision making: Research Articles , 2008 .

[21]  Pratyush Sen,et al.  Multiple Attribute Design Evaluation of Complex Engineering Products Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach , 1997 .

[22]  Ta-Chung Chu,et al.  An extension to fuzzy MCDM , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[23]  Thomas Hanne,et al.  Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Yong Deng,et al.  Evaluating Sensor Reliability in Classification Problems Based on Evidence Theory , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[25]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Articulation of Preferences in Multiple Criterion Decision‐Making (MCDM) Methods , 1988 .

[26]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Shi Wen-kang,et al.  Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence , 2004 .

[28]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[29]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  DS/AHP method: A mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Deng Yong,et al.  A TOPSIS-BASED CENTROID–INDEX RANKING METHOD OF FUZZY NUMBERS AND ITS APPLICATION IN DECISION-MAKING , 2005 .

[31]  Shinya Hanaoka,et al.  Multiple Criteria and Fuzzy Based Evaluation of Logistics Performance for Intermodal Transportation , 2009 .

[32]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A knowledge‐based approach to adversarial decision making , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Mathias Bauer,et al.  Approximation algorithms and decision making in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence - An empirical study , 1997, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[34]  Eric Lefevre,et al.  Belief function combination and conflict management , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[35]  Rajendra P. Srivastava,et al.  Applications of Belief Functions in Business Decisions: A Review , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[36]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[37]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Flexible decision modeling of reverse logistics system: A value adding MCDM approach for alternative selection , 2009 .

[38]  M. Beynon,et al.  The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling , 2000 .

[39]  Deng Yong.  Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS , 2006 .