Flow-Field Measurement of Device-Induced Embedded Streamwise Vortex on a Flat Plate

Detailed flow-field measurements were performed downstream of a single vortex generator (VG) using an advanced Stereo Digital Particle Image Velocimetry system. Thc passive flow-control devices examined consisted of a low-profile VG with a device height, h, approximately equal to 20 percent of the boundary-layer thickness, sigma, and a conventional VG with h is approximately sigma. Flow-field data were taken at twelve cross-flow planes downstream of the VG to document and quantify the evolution of embedded streamwise vortex. The effects of device angle of attack on vortex development downstream were compared between the low-profile VG and the conventional VG. Key parameters including vorticity, circulation, trajectory, and half-life radius - describing concentration, strength, path, and size, respectively--of the device-induced streamwise vortex were extracted from the flow-field data. The magnitude of maximum vorticity increases as angle of attack increases for the low-profile VG, but the trend is reversed for the conventional VG, probably due to flow stalling around the larger device at higher angles of attack. Peak vorticity and circulation for the low-profile VG decays exponentially and inversely proportional to the distance downstream from the device. The device-height normalized vortex trajectories for the low-profile VG, especially in the lateral direction, follow the general trends of the conventional VG. The experimental database was used to validate the predictive capability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). CFD accurately predicts the vortex circulation and path; however, improvements are needed for predicting the vorticity strength and vortex size.

[1]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  ACTIVE INLET FLOW CONTROL TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION , 2000 .

[2]  L. N. Jenkins,et al.  FLOW CONTROL DEVICE EVALUATION FOR AN INTERNAL FLOW WITH AN ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT , 2002 .

[3]  G. B. Schubauer,et al.  Forced mixing in boundary layers , 1960, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Reynaldo J. Gomez,et al.  Advances in automatic overset grid generation around surface discontinuities , 1999 .

[5]  William Murphy,et al.  The application of sub-boundary layer vortex generators to reduce canopy 'Mach rumble' interior noise on the Gulfstream III , 1987 .

[6]  Jeffrey W. Hamstra,et al.  Active inlet flow control technology demonstration , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[7]  Brian G. Allan,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Vortex Generator Vanes and Jets on a Flat Plate , 2002 .

[8]  J. Lin,et al.  Small submerged vortex generators for turbulent flow separation control , 1990 .

[9]  John Fulker,et al.  Studies of flows induced by Sub Boundary Layer Vortex Generators (SBVGs) , 2002 .

[10]  W. Hingst,et al.  Structure and development of streamwise vortex arrays embedded in a turbulent boundary layer , 1993 .

[11]  Stephen K. Robinson,et al.  Separation control on high-lift airfoils via micro-vortex generators , 1994 .

[12]  H. Pearcey INTRODUCTION TO SHOCK-INDUCED SEPARATION AND ITS PREVENTION BY DESIGN AND BOUNDARY LAYER CONTROL , 1961 .

[13]  F. Menter Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[14]  John K. Eaton,et al.  Interaction Between a Vortex and a Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part 1: Mean Flow Evolution and Turbulence Properties , 1987 .