The outcomes of repeat surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis

Purpose of review To evaluate the efficacy of second-line surgery in the management of recurrent endometriosis. Recent findings Long-term probability of pain recurrence after repeat conservative surgery for recurrent endometriosis varies between 20 and 40%. The association of presacral neurectomy to the treatment of endometriosis might be effective in reducing midline pain; however, no studies have evaluated this procedure among patients with recurrent disease. The medium-term outcome of hysterectomy for endometriosis-associated pain is quite satisfactory; nevertheless, probability of pain persistence after hysterectomy is 15% and risk of pain worsening 3–5%, with a six times higher risk of further surgery in patients with ovarian preservation as compared to ovarian removal. The conception rate among women undergoing repetitive surgery for recurrent endometriosis associated with infertility is 26%, whereas the overall crude pregnancy rate after a primary procedure is 41%. Summary Repeat conservative surgery for pelvic pain associated with recurrent endometriosis has the same efficacy and limitations as primary surgery. Conversely, after repeat conservative surgery for infertility, the pregnancy rate is almost half the rate obtained after primary surgery. More data are needed to define the best therapeutic option in women with recurrent endometriosis, in terms of pain relief, pregnancy rate and patient compliance.

[1]  Sun‐Wei Guo,et al.  Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. , 2009, Human reproduction update.

[2]  L. Lu [Endometriosis and infertility]. , 1987, Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi.

[3]  A. Magos Endometriosis: radical surgery. , 1993, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  J. Bena,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis: A 7-Year Follow-up on the Requirement for Further Surgery , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Is there a solution for recurrent endometriosis? , 1991, British journal of clinical practice. Supplement.

[6]  J. Rock,et al.  The Efficacy of Presacral Neurectomy for the Relief of Midline Dysmenorrhea , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  L. Fedele,et al.  Tailoring radicality in demolitive surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  P. Vercellini,et al.  Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: a pragmatic approach. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[9]  R. Schenken,et al.  Reoperation after initial treatment of endometriosis with conservative surgery. , 1978, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  P. Vercellini,et al.  The second time around: reproductive performance after repetitive versus primary surgery for endometriosis. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  P. Vercellini,et al.  Pelvic denervation for chronic pain associated with endometriosis: fact or fancy? , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  P. Vercellini,et al.  Repetitive Conservative Surgery for Recurrence of Endometriosis , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  T. Falcone,et al.  Comparison of reoperation for moderate (stage III) and severe (stage IV) endometriosis-related infertility with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  S. Cheewadhanaraks Comparison of fecundity after second laparotomy for endometriosis to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[15]  F. Zullo,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of presacral neurectomy for the treatment of severe dysmenorrhea due to endometriosis. , 2004, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[16]  A. Magos 11 Endometriosis: Radical surgery , 1993 .

[17]  A. Birmingham,et al.  The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology , 2006 .

[18]  J. Rock,et al.  Incidence of symptom recurrence after hysterectomy for endometriosis. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  R. Pal,et al.  Development of contraceptive vaccines for humans using antigens derived from gametes (spermatozoa and zona pellucida) and hormones (human chorionic gonadotrophin): current status. , 1995, Human reproduction update.

[20]  P. Vercellini,et al.  Presacral neurectomy for the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a controlled study. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  J. Love,et al.  Recurrent pain after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy for endometriosis: evaluation of laparoscopic excision of residual endometriosis , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[22]  G. Adamson Laparoscopy, in vitro fertilization, and endometriosis: an enigma. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  P. Vercellini,et al.  The effect of surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: the other side of the story. , 2009, Human reproduction update.

[24]  P. Vercellini,et al.  Repetitive surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis: what to do? , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[25]  R. Raffaelli,et al.  Surgical treatment of recurrent endometriosis: laparotomy versus laparoscopy. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[26]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Recurrent endometriosis: incidence, management, and prognosis. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  R. Raffaelli,et al.  Laparoscopic excision of recurrent endometriomas: long-term outcome and comparison with primary surgery. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  Paola Viganò,et al.  The effect of second‐line surgery on reproductive performance of women with recurrent endometriosis: A systematic review , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.