Minimising the environmental footprint of industrial-scaled cleaning processes by optimisation of a novel clean-in-place system protocol

Abstract Cleaning of food fouling deposits in processing equipment is costly and time consuming. Fouling deposits form as a result of adhesion of species to the surface and cohesion between elements of the material. Cleaning can result from either or both adhesive and cohesive failure. In this study, the aim was to investigate the removal kinetics of an adhesive material and to design a novel cleaning in place (CIP) protocol for these kinds of materials at industrial scale to reduce environmental impact of cleaning processes. It was detected that different variables controlled the cleaning process in removal of adhesive deposit. Temperature was not found as a significant variable in the initial stage of cleaning. Velocity of cleaning water controlled the cleaning at this stage when top layers of the deposit were removed by fluid mechanical removal due to breakdown of weak cohesive interaction. In the later cleaning stage, both velocity and temperature significantly contributed to cleaning, which suggested that both hydrodynamic forces and rheological changes are needed to overcome adhesion forces between the deposit and surface. Hence, a novel “two step CIP protocol” was proposed due to existence of different mechanisms in cleaning. When compared with conventional one step CIP protocols currently used in the processing plants, the proposed CIP protocol reduced the energy consumption by 40% without decreasing the cleaning efficiency.

[1]  P. Fryer,et al.  The Effect of Pulsing Cleaning Chemicals on the Cleaning of Whey Protein Deposits , 2006 .

[2]  Peter J. Fryer,et al.  Quantification of the cleaning of egg albumin deposits using micromanipulation and direct observation techniques , 2007 .

[3]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  Water in food production and processing: quantity and quality concerns , 2003 .

[4]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[5]  Karen A. F. Copeland.  Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed. , 2001 .

[6]  Ismail Hakki Boyaci,et al.  Investigating the effects of ingredient levels on physical quality properties of cooked hamburger patties using response surface methodology and image processing technology. , 2010, Meat science.

[7]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[8]  Peter J. Fryer,et al.  A prototype cleaning map: A classification of industrial cleaning processes , 2009 .

[9]  T. Benezech,et al.  Application of turbulent pulsating flows to the bacterial removal during a cleaning in place procedure. Part 2: Effects on cleaning efficiency , 2009 .

[10]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Life cycle assessment of beer production in Greece , 2005 .

[11]  Roger Phan-Tan-Luu,et al.  Pharmaceutical Experimental Design , 1998 .

[12]  P. A. Cole,et al.  Cleaning of toothpaste from process equipment by fluid flow at laboratory and pilot scales , 2013 .

[13]  F. Kaymak-Ertekin,et al.  Optimization of osmotic dehydration of potato using response surface methodology , 2007 .

[15]  D. W. Brinkman,et al.  The cleaning of heat exchangers and evaporators after processing milk or whey , 1994 .

[16]  Peter J. Fryer,et al.  Identification of cohesive and adhesive effects in the cleaning of food fouling deposits , 2006 .

[17]  Deniz Baş,et al.  Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology , 2007 .

[18]  Antonio Delgado,et al.  Optimisation of water usage in a brewery clean-in-place system using reference nets , 2015 .

[19]  Zhibing Zhang,et al.  Matching the nano- to the meso-scale: Measuring deposit–surface interactions with atomic force microscopy and micromanipulation , 2010 .