Compressed Sensing of Sparse Multipath MIMO Channels with Superimposed Training Sequence

Recent advances in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems have renewed the interests of researchers to further explore this area for addressing various dynamic challenges of emerging radio communication networks. Various measurement campaigns reported recently in the literature show that physical multipath MIMO channels exhibit sparse impulse response structure in various outdoor radio propagation environments. Therefore, a comprehensive physical description of sparse multipath MIMO channels is presented in first part of this paper. Superimposing a training sequence (low power, periodic) over the information sequence offers an improvement in the spectral efficiency by avoiding the use of dedicated time/frequency slots for the training sequence, which is unlike the traditional schemes. The main contribution of this paper includes three superimposed training (SiT) sequence based channel estimation techniques for sparse multipath MIMO channels. The proposed techniques exploit the compressed sensing theory and prior available knowledge of channel’s sparsity. The proposed sparse MIMO channel estimation techniques are named as, SiT based compressed channel sensing (SiT-CCS), SiT based hardlimit thresholding with CCS (SiT-ThCCS), and SiT training based match pursuit (SiT-MP). Bit error rate (BER) and normalized channel mean square error are used as metrics for the simulation analysis to gauge the performance of proposed techniques. A comparison of the proposed schemes with a notable first order statistics based SiT least squares (SiT-LS) estimation technique is presented to establish the improvements achieved by the proposed schemes. For sparse multipath time-invariant MIMO communication channels, it is observed that SiT-CCS, SiT-MP, and SiT-ThCCS can provide an improvement up to 2, 3.5, and 5.2 dB in the MSE at signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 12 dB when compared to SiT-LS, respectively. Moreover, for $$\mathrm {BER}=10^{-1.9}$$BER=10-1.9, the proposed SiT-CCS, SiT-MP, and SiT-ThCCS, compared to SiT-LS, can offer a gain of about 1, 2.5, and 3.5 dB in the SNR, respectively. The performance gain in MSE and BER is observed to improve with an increase in the channel sparsity.

[1]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[2]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Toeplitz Compressed Sensing Matrices With Applications to Sparse Channel Estimation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Holger Rauhut,et al.  Compressive Estimation of Doubly Selective Channels in Multicarrier Systems: Leakage Effects and Sparsity-Enhancing Processing , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[4]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Sparse equalization for real-time digital underwater acoustic communications , 1995, 'Challenges of Our Changing Global Environment'. Conference Proceedings. OCEANS '95 MTS/IEEE.

[5]  A. Yongacoglu,et al.  Sparse channel estimation using orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[6]  Yunlong Cai,et al.  Turbo equalization based on compressive sensing channel estimation in wideband HF systems , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing.

[7]  J. Príncipe,et al.  Sparse channel estimation with regularization method using convolution inequality for entropy , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[8]  Sundeep Rangan,et al.  Estimating Sparse MIMO channels having Common Support , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[9]  Khoa N. Le On Angle-of-Arrival and Time-of-Arrival Statistics of Geometric Scattering Channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Abolfazl Mehbodniya,et al.  Adaptive Sparse Channel Estimation for Time-Variant MIMO Communication Systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[11]  Shree Krishna Sharma,et al.  Superimposed training based estimation of sparse MIMO channels for emerging wireless networks , 2016, 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT).

[12]  L. Greenstein,et al.  Tap-selectable decision-feedback equalization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Terence Tao,et al.  The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when P is much larger than n , 2005, math/0506081.

[14]  Fumiyuki Adachi,et al.  Sparse Multipath Channel Estimation Using Compressive Sampling Matching Pursuit Algorithm , 2010, ArXiv.

[15]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse channel estimation via matching pursuit with application to equalization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[16]  Zhi Zhang,et al.  A Novel Sparse Channel Estimation Method for Multipath MIMO-OFDM Systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[17]  Khawza I. Ahmed,et al.  Superimposed training-based compressed sensing of sparse multipath channels , 2012, IET Commun..

[18]  Ramakrishna Janaswamy,et al.  Angle and time of arrival statistics for the Gaussian scatter density model , 2002, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[19]  Jitendra K. Tugnait,et al.  On Superimposed Training for MIMO Channel Estimation and Symbol Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Peter Willett,et al.  Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: From subspace methods to compressed sensing , 2009 .

[21]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Noor M. Khan,et al.  A Generalized 3-D Scattering Model for a Macrocell Environment With a Directional Antenna at the BS , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  F. Mazzenga Channel estimation and equalization for M-QAM transmission with a hidden pilot sequence , 2000 .

[24]  W. F. Schreiber,et al.  Advanced television systems for terrestrial broadcasting: Some problems and some proposed solutions , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  Jitendra K. Tugnait,et al.  On channel estimation using superimposed training and first-order statistics , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[26]  Michael P. Fitz,et al.  Reduced complexity decision feedback equalization for multipath channels with large delay spreads , 1999, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[27]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny,et al.  Pilot-based channel identification: proposal for semi-blind identification of communication channels , 1995 .

[29]  Abdul Haseeb,et al.  GA Based Sensing of Sparse Multipath Channels with Superimposed Training Sequence , 2016 .

[30]  Wei-xiao Meng,et al.  Sparse underwater acoustic OFDM channel estimation based on superimposed training , 2009 .

[31]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Compressed Channel Sensing: A New Approach to Estimating Sparse Multipath Channels , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  The role of small cells, coordinated multipoint, and massive MIMO in 5G , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  Noor Muhammad Khan Modeling and characterization of multipath fading channels in cellular mobile communication systems , 2006 .

[34]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[35]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Minimum bit-error rate design for space-time equalization-based multiuser detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[36]  Ming Lu,et al.  A physical spatio-temporal model of multipath propagation channels , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.