The Chronic Detrimental Impact of Interruptions in a Simulated Submarine Track Management Task

Objective: The objective of this article is to examine the extent to which interruptions negatively impact situation awareness and long-term performance in a submarine track management task where pre- and postinterruption display scenes remained essentially identical. Background: Interruptions in command and control task environments can degrade performance well beyond the first postinterruption action typically measured for sequential static tasks, because individuals need to recover their situation awareness for multiple unfolding display events. Participants in the current study returned to an unchanged display scene following interruption and therefore could be more immune to such long-term performance deficits. Method: The task required participants to monitor a display to detect contact heading changes and to make enemy engagement decisions. Situation awareness (Situation Present Assessment Method) and subjective workload (NASA–Task Load Index) were measured. The interruption replaced the display for 20 s with a blank screen, during which participants completed a classification task. Results: Situation awareness after returning from interruption was degraded. Participants were slower to make correct engagement decisions and slower and less accurate in detecting heading changes, despite these task decisions being made at least 40 s following the interruption. Conclusion: Interruptions negatively impacted situation awareness and long-term performance because participants needed to redetermine the location and spatial relationship between the displayed contacts when returning from interruption, either because their situation awareness for the preinterruption scene decayed or because they did not encode the preinterruption scene. Application: Interruption in work contexts such as submarines is unavoidable, and further understanding of how operators are affected is required to improve work design and training.

[1]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Situation Awareness Measures for Simulated Submarine Track Management , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Harvey S. Smallman,et al.  Staying Up to Speed: Four Design Principles for Maintaining and Recovering Situation Awareness , 2008 .

[3]  Deborah A Boehm-Davis,et al.  Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Mitigating disruptive effects of interruptions through training: what needs to be practiced? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Rahul M. Dodhia,et al.  Interruptions create prospective memory tasks , 2009 .

[6]  Shayne Loft,et al.  A theory and model of conflict detection in air traffic control: incorporating environmental constraints. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Soft constraints in interactive behavior: the case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  J. Trafton,et al.  The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Dealing With Task Interruptions in Complex Dynamic Environments , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) , 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[11]  Raj M. Ratwani,et al.  Spatial memory guides task resumption , 2008 .

[12]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[13]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Not Now! Supporting Interruption Management by Indicating the Modality and Urgency of Pending Tasks , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Using the situation present assessment method to measure situation awareness in simulated submarine track management , 2013 .

[17]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  M. B. Edwards,et al.  Task interruption and its effects on memory. , 1998, Memory.

[20]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Situation Awareness Recovery , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Avi Parush,et al.  Where Did they Go? Recovering Dynamic Objects after Interruptions , 2010 .

[22]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Background Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict? , 2014 .