Videometric applications in wind tunnels

Videometric measurements in wind tunnels can be very challenging due to the limited optical access, model dynamics, optical path variability during testing, large range of temperature and pressure, hostile environment, and the requirements for high productivity and large amounts of data on a daily basis. Other complications for wind tunnel testing include the model support mechanism and stringent surface finish requirements for the models in order to maintain aerodynamic fidelity. For these reasons nontraditional photogrammetric techniques and procedures sometimes must be employed. In this paper several such applications are discussed for wind tunnels which include test conditions with Mach numbers from low speed to hypersonic, pressures from less than an atmosphere to nearly seven atmospheres, and temperatures from cryogenic to above room temperature. Several of the wind tunnel facilities are continuous flow while one is a short duration blow-down facility. Videometric techniques and calibration procedures developed to measure angle of attack, the change in wing twist and bending induced by aerodynamic load, and the effects of varying model injection rates are described. Some advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are given and comparisons are made with non-optical and more traditional video photogrammetric techniques.

[1]  R. Crites.  Development of a simple optical pitch sensor , 1986 .

[2]  D. E. Fuller,et al.  Guide for users of the National Transonic Facility , 1981 .

[3]  Alpheus W. Burner,et al.  STATIC AEROELASTIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSONIC WIND TUNNEL MODELS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHODS , 1997 .

[4]  J. Bell,et al.  Pressure-sensitive paint in aerodynamic testing , 1993 .

[5]  Dennis Koga,et al.  DARWIN - Integrated instrumentation and intelligent database elements , 1996 .

[6]  Ping Tcheng,et al.  Model attitude measurements at NASA Langley Research Center , 1992 .

[7]  P. H. Fuykschot.  Vibration compensation of gravity sensing inclinometers in windtunnel models , 1996 .

[8]  Alpheus W. Burner.  Zoom lens calibration for wind tunnel measurements , 1995, Other Conferences.

[9]  J. D. Brooks,et al.  Measurement of model aeroelastic deformations in the wind tunnel at transonic speeds using stereophotogrammetry , 1977 .

[10]  J. P. Crowder,et al.  Comparison of model attitude systems - Active target photogrammetry, precision accelerometer, and laser interferometer , 1996 .

[11]  C. R. Pond,et al.  Laser angle sensor development , 1980 .

[12]  T.K. McDevitt,et al.  An optical angle of attack sensor , 1989, International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilitie.

[13]  Bryan Campbell,et al.  Temperature- and Pressure-Sensitive Luminescent Paints in Aerodynamics , 1997 .

[14]  A. W. Burner,et al.  Automated Wing Twist and Bending Measurements Under Aerodynamic Load , 1996 .

[15]  John S. Tripp,et al.  Dynamic response tests of inertial and optical wind-tunnel model attitude measurement devices , 1995 .

[16]  W Burner Alpheus,et al.  Wing Twist Measurements at the National Transonic Facility , 1996 .

[17]  James H. Bell,et al.  Image registration for luminescent paint applications , 1993 .

[18]  L. Cattafesta,et al.  Review and application of non-topographic photogrammetry to quantitative flow visualization , 1996 .