Discharge patterns of single auditory nerve fibers were recorded from normal-hearing cats implanted with a 12-band intracochlear electrode array. Stimuli were biphasic current pulses of specifiable width, amplitude, and rate. Acoustic tuning curves were obtained to determine the cochlear positions of the fibers. Response latencies to electrical stimuli formed two groups. Short latency (0.3 to 0.7 ms) responses were attributed to direct activation of spiral ganglion neurons. At high stimulus intensities, these often exhibited abrupt shifts toward even shorter latencies. Long latency (> 1.5 ms) responses were probably caused by electrophonic activation of functional hair cells. Response thresholds to electrical stimuli depended on a fiber's proximity to the stimulating electrodes, and they did not depend on a fiber's acoustic response threshold or spontaneous discharge rate. High intensity (> 1.5 mA) stimuli could excite fibers over a wide range of characteristic frequencies, even for the narrowest (0.45 mm) electrode separations. Response threshold was an exponentially decreasing function of pulse width for widths up to 300 μs/phase. Fiber discharges were highly phase-locked at all suprathreshold intensities, and saturation discharge rates usually equaled stimulus pulse rates for rates up to at least 800 pulses/s. Dynamic ranges were small (1 to 6 dB), increased with pulse rate, and were uncorrelated with electrical response threshold. Within the dynamic range, shapes of poststimulus time and interspike interval histograms resembled those obtained in response to acoustic stimuli. Depolarization block caused fiber activity to cease in 2 to 5 seconds for sustained stimuli presented at high (> 600 pulses/s) pulse rates and intensities.
[1]
P. Stypulkowski,et al.
Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings
,
1984,
Hearing Research.
[2]
Edwin Charles Moxon,et al.
Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear
,
1971
.
[3]
P J Blamey,et al.
Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients.
,
1982,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4]
M M Merzenich,et al.
Neural Encoding of Sound Sensation Evoked by Electrical Stimulation of the Acoustic Nerve
,
1973,
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.
[5]
Rainer Hartmann,et al.
Electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea. Discharge pattern of single auditory fibres
,
1984
.
[6]
G M Clark,et al.
A multiple-channel cochlear implant. Evaluation using speech tracking.
,
1981,
Archives of otolaryngology.
[7]
G. Clark,et al.
A multiple-channel cochlear implant. A summary of results for two patients.
,
1982,
Archives of otolaryngology.
[8]
E. Javel,et al.
Suppression of auditory nerve responses I: temporal analysis, intensity effects and suppression contours.
,
1981,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9]
Ben M. Clopton,et al.
Unit responses at cochlear nucleus to electrical stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis
,
1984,
Hearing Research.