Comparing marginal effects of Chilean students' economic, social and cultural status on digital versus reading and mathematics performance

This paper provides evidence that helps understand the digital divide in education. It does so by comparing the effect of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS) on the digital skills of Chilean students compared with mathematics and language. This comparison is made using national standardized tests. The marginal effect of a group of variables measuring student ESCS was compared both as a whole and separately using multivariate linear regression analysis. The results show that the marginal effect of ESCS as a whole on students' digital skills was equal to the effect on mathematics and greater than the effect on language. Furthermore, the results show that the parents' level of education was the most relevant factor of ESCS for explaining student performance on the digital test, more so than for mathematics and language. These findings challenge the belief that the Internet would reduce economic, social and cultural inequalities in new generations. Instead, they reveal that the gap among Chilean students tends to perpetuate or widen when comparing performance in mathematics and language with performance in the digital domain. At the same time, by comparing national test results, this paper offers empirical evidence for the existence of a second digital divide in the field of education, a concept which is widely discussed at a theoretical level but with little empirical support to date. This paper provides evidence of the second digital divide in education.We compare socioeconomic variables' effect on digital skills versus math and language tests.Socioeconomic variables have an equal or greater effect in the digital skills test.Findings show that the socioeconomic gap tends to perpetuate or widen in the digital realm.

[1]  Andrew McConney,et al.  School socioeconomic status and student outcomes in reading and mathematics: A comparison of Australia and Canada , 2013 .

[2]  R. Bradley,et al.  Socioeconomic status and child development. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Measuring Internet Skills , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Oecd Indicators.  Education at a Glance 2007 , 2007 .

[5]  Gilbert Fawcett Peaker,et al.  The Plowden children four years later , 1971 .

[6]  D. Phillips,et al.  From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development , 2000 .

[7]  A. Zellner.  An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[8]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Technology as amplifier in international development , 2011, iConference.

[9]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Proposing a Survey Instrument for Measuring Operational, Formal, Information, and Strategic Internet Skills , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[11]  J. Mercy,et al.  Familial Influence on the Intellectual Attainment of Children. , 1982 .

[12]  Alice Sullivan,et al.  Cultural Capital, Cultural Knowledge and Ability , 2008 .

[13]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  E. Hoff-Ginsberg,et al.  Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. , 1991, Child development.

[15]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[16]  F. Holgado-Tello,et al.  Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables , 2008 .

[17]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Beyond the digital divide: Rethinking digital inclusion for the 21st century , 2007 .

[18]  J. Enrique Hinostroza,et al.  Factors (not) affecting what students do with computers and internet at home , 2015 .

[19]  Francisco Pablo Holgado Tello,et al.  Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables , 2010 .

[20]  Marco Gui,et al.  Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students , 2011, New Media Soc..

[21]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Information and strategic Internet skills of secondary students: A performance test , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people's web use skills , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Eugenio Severin and Christine Capota.  One-to-One Laptop Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2011 .

[25]  Selcuk R. Sirin.  Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research , 2005 .

[26]  J. Fraillon,et al.  National Assessment Program--ICT Literacy Years 6 & 10 Report, 2005. , 2007 .

[27]  John Cresswell,et al.  PISA 2009 Technical Report , 2012 .

[28]  E. Hargittai.  The Digital Reproduction of Inequality , 2008 .

[29]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Donald A. Norman.  Worsening the Knowledge Gap * , 1984 .

[31]  Julian Fraillon.  The 'digital natives' and ICT literacy , 2012 .

[32]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[33]  J. Fraillon,et al.  Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report , 2014 .

[34]  Emma Näslund-Hadley,et al.  OLPC Pre-Pilot Evaluation Report (Haiti) , 2009 .

[35]  Alexander M. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[36]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach , 2006 .

[37]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[38]  J. Fraillon,et al.  IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 Assessment Framework , 2019 .

[39]  Ove Edvard Hatlevik,et al.  Predictors of digital competence in 7th grade: a multilevel analysis , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[40]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  The digital divide shifts to differences in usage , 2014, New Media Soc..

[41]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  Wolfram Schulz,et al.  Measuring the socio-economic background of students and its effect on achievement in PISA 2000 and PISA 2003 , 2005 .

[43]  Eden Litt,et al.  Measuring users’ internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future , 2013, New Media Soc..

[44]  Ferrari Anusca.  DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. , 2013 .

[45]  L. Rowell Huesmann,et al.  Long-term Effects of Parents' Education on Children's Educational and Occupational Success: Mediation by Family Interactions, Child Aggression, and Teenage Aspirations , 2009, Merrill-Palmer quarterly.

[46]  J. V. Dijk.  Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings , 2006 .