ERPs Recorded during Early Second Language Exposure Predict Syntactic Learning

Millions of adults worldwide are faced with the task of learning a second language (L2). Understanding the neural mechanisms that support this learning process is an important area of scientific inquiry. However, most previous studies on the neural mechanisms underlying L2 acquisition have focused on characterizing the results of learning, relying upon end-state outcome measures in which learning is assessed after it has occurred, rather than on the learning process itself. In this study, we adopted a novel and more direct approach to investigate neural mechanisms engaged during L2 learning, in which we recorded ERPs from beginning adult learners as they were exposed to an unfamiliar L2 for the first time. Learners' proficiency in the L2 was then assessed behaviorally using a grammaticality judgment task, and ERP data acquired during initial L2 exposure were sorted as a function of performance on this task. High-proficiency learners showed a larger N100 effect to open-class content words compared with closed-class function words, whereas low-proficiency learners did not show a significant N100 difference between open- and closed-class words. In contrast, amplitude of the N400 word category effect correlated with learners' L2 comprehension, rather than predicting syntactic learning. Taken together, these results indicate that learners who spontaneously direct greater attention to open- rather than closed-class words when processing L2 input show better syntactic learning, suggesting a link between selective attention to open-class content words and acquisition of basic morphosyntactic rules. These findings highlight the importance of selective attention mechanisms for L2 acquisition.

[1]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Second-language learning and changes in the brain , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[2]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  ERP correlates of lexical analysis: N280 reflects processing complexity rather than category or frequency effects , 2005, Neuroreport.

[3]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[5]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  P. Hagoort Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: An event-related brain potential study , 2006, Brain Research.

[11]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Consciousness, rules and instructed second language acquisition , 1996 .

[12]  Douglas J. Davidson,et al.  An Event-related Potential Study on Changes of Violation and Error Responses during Morphosyntactic Learning , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Predictability affects early perceptual processing of word onsets in continuous speech , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Paula M. Winke,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LANGUAGE LEARNER: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  F. Rösler,et al.  Auditory memory in congenitally blind adults: a behavioral-electrophysiological investigation. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  P. Robinson Individual differences and instructed language learning , 2002 .

[19]  A. Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Beth A. Harn,et al.  Examining the Role of Attention and Instruction in At-Risk Kindergarteners , 2013, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  B. Vanpatten,et al.  Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research , 1998 .

[23]  Karl C. Diller,et al.  Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude , 1985 .

[24]  A. Szentkuti,et al.  Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  H. Heinze,et al.  Perceptual Priming Versus Explicit Memory: Dissociable Neural Correlates at Encoding , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Alan Davies,et al.  Handbook of Applied Linguistics , 2003 .

[27]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Visual statistical learning of shape sequences: An ERP study , 2009, Neuroscience Research.

[28]  S. Andrews,et al.  An event-related potential study of semantic congruity and repetition in a sentence-reading task: effects of context change. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  On-line Assessment of Statistical Learning by Event-related Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Second Language Training Recruit Common Neural Mechanisms for Syntactic Processing , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Nina Spada,et al.  语言学习机制=How languages are learned , 1995 .

[33]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[34]  M. Posner,et al.  Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  The neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study , 2013, Brain and Language.

[38]  H. Neville,et al.  Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed-class words: an ERP study of bilinguals. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  J. W. Kimball,et al.  Predictive analysis and over-the-top parsing , 1975 .

[40]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Norman Segalowitz Individual differences in second language acquisition. , 1997 .

[42]  Michael Bersick,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[43]  K. Paller,et al.  Recall and stem-completion priming have different electrophysiological correlates and are modified differentially by directed forgetting. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[45]  C. C. Wood,et al.  ERPs predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[46]  R. Schmidt The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[47]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Alison Mackey,et al.  The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition , 2012 .

[49]  R. Leow Attention, Awareness, and Foreign Language Behavior , 1997 .

[50]  Marta Kutas,et al.  CHAPTER 15 A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing , 2010 .

[51]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Different Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Word and Rule Extraction from Speech , 2007, PloS one.

[52]  Ronald P. Leow,et al.  Attention and awareness in SLA , 2005 .

[53]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  R. Leow Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) finegrained analysis of attention , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[55]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning , 2010 .

[57]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[58]  Julie I. Cohen,et al.  Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Peter Skehan,et al.  4. Theorising and updating aptitude , 2002 .

[60]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: Electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children , 2008, Brain Research.

[61]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to acoustic and phonetic cues , 1978, Biological Psychology.

[63]  R. Schmidt Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Attention , 2001 .

[64]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Words in the brain: lexical determinants of word-induced brain activity , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[65]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words , 1986 .

[66]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Input processing in second language acquisition , 2003 .

[67]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space , 1977 .

[68]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[69]  P. Skehan Individual Differences in Second Language Learning , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[70]  E. Donchin,et al.  “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[72]  Josep Marco-Pallarés,et al.  Time course and functional neuroanatomy of speech segmentation in adults , 2009, NeuroImage.

[73]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[74]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Mechanisms of Word Learning in a Narrative Context: An Event-related Potential Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[76]  Cristina Sanz,et al.  Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice , 2005 .

[77]  Antoni Rodríguez Fornells,et al.  Brain dynamics sustaining rapid rule extraction from speech , 2011 .

[78]  R. S. Tomlin,et al.  Attention in Cognitive Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.