Tracking current and forecasting future land-use impacts of agricultural value chains. 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 3rd of November 2017, Zurich, Switzerland

The 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), organised by partners of the European project RELIEF (RELIability of product Environmental Footprints), focused on methods for better understanding the impacts of land use linked to agricultural value chains. The first session of the forum was dedicated to methods that help in retrospective tracking of land use within complex supply chains. Novel approaches were presented for the integration of increasingly available spatially located land use data into LCA. The second session focused on forward-looking projections of land use change and included emerging, predictive methods for the modelling of land change. The third session considered impact assessment methods related to the use of land and their application together with land change modelling approaches. Discussions throughout the day centred on opportunities and challenges arising from integrating spatially located land use information into Life Cycle Assessment. Increasing amounts of spatially located land use data are becoming available and this could potentially increase the robustness and specificity of Life Cycle Assessment. However, the use of such data can be computationally expensive and requires the development of skills (i.e. use of geographical information systems (GIS) and model coding) within the LCA community. Land change modelling and ecosystem service modelling are associated with considerable uncertainty which must be communicated appropriately to stakeholders and decision-makers when interpreting results from an LCA. The new approaches were found to challenge aspects of the traditional LCA approach—particularly the division between the life cycle inventory and impact assessment and the assumption of linearity between scale and impacts when deriving characterisation factors. The presentations from the DF-67 are available for download (www.lcaforum.ch), and video recordings can be accessed online (http://www.video.ethz.ch/events/lca/2017/autumn/67th.html).

[1]  Jürgen Reinhard,et al.  Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[2]  Daniel Moran,et al.  Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains , 2016, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[3]  Peter H Verburg,et al.  Land cover change or land‐use intensification: simulating land system change with a global‐scale land change model , 2013, Global change biology.

[4]  German Cockroaches In,et al.  INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF , 1984 .

[5]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Integrated Management of Land Use Systems under Systemic Risks and Security Targets: A Stochastic Global Biosphere Management Model , 2016 .

[6]  Victoria J. Burton,et al.  Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment , 2016, Science.

[7]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Quantifying Land Use Impacts on Biodiversity: Combining Species-Area Models and Vulnerability Indicators. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[9]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Mapping the Carbon Footprint of Nations. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Hotspots of uncertainty in land‐use and land‐cover change projections: a global‐scale model comparison , 2016, Global change biology.

[11]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss , 2009, Ecosystems.

[12]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2017, Nature Communications.

[13]  DanielMoran Tracing global supply chains to air pollution hotspots , 2016 .