Bit-Level Power-Law Queueing Theory with Applications in LTE Networks

Though the classical packet-level queueing theory, which treats each packet as an entry, has achieved a great success in network analysis, it can be inaccurate when directly applied to long-term evolution (LTE) networks. This is because arriving packets could be broken down at the LTE base station server across adjacent transmission time intervals (TTIs), which are the smallest scheduling time units in LTE networks. In this paper, we first propose an innovative bit-level queueing theory to address the challenges in performance analysis of LTE networks. To consider the randomness in packet arrivals and packet lengths, we propose two representative compound network traffic models-Poisson-Exponential (PE) and Zeta-Pareto (ZP) models-to approximate light-tailed and heavy-tailed network traffic, respectively. PE models are suitable for conventional voice and low-speed services, while ZP models, which compound power-law distributions, describe complicated high-speed network applications. We derive tail asymptotics for the distributions of the number of bit arrivals in one TTI and the corresponding waiting time. Based on the results in bit-level queueing theory, we present engineering applications that take into account user experience, including estimating the user experience rate (UER), the busy UER and hourly traffic volume. The theoretical results are then validated through extensive simulations. Our novel traffic estimation approach has been adopted by Wireless Product Line at Huawei for network capacity planning and also projected to International Telecommunication Union (ITU) to compose 5G standards.

[1]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Fluid models and solutions for large-scale IP networks , 2003, SIGMETRICS '03.

[2]  G. Gupur,et al.  QUEUEING MODEL WITH SECOND OPTIONAL SERVICE , 2010 .

[3]  Bert Zwart,et al.  Tails in scheduling , 2007, PERV.

[4]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Fluid Queues with Heavy-Tailed M/G/ Input , 2005, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Transition from Heavy to Light Tails in Retransmission Durations , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  Feng Qian,et al.  An in-depth study of LTE: effect of network protocol and application behavior on performance , 2013, SIGCOMM.

[7]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Scheduling Policies in Time and Frequency Domains for LTE Downlink Channel: A Performance Comparison , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Kensuke Fukuda,et al.  Scaling in Internet Traffic: A 14 Year and 3 Day Longitudinal Study, With Multiscale Analyses and Random Projections , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Colin M. Ramsay,et al.  The Distribution of Sums of Certain I.I.D. Pareto Variates , 2006 .

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[12]  P. Ralph,et al.  A POISSON–PARETO MODEL OF CHLOROPHYLL-A FLUORESCENCE SIGNALS IN MARINE ENVIRONMENTS , 2015, The ANZIAM Journal.

[13]  Bin Liu,et al.  Tail asymptotics of the waiting time and the busy period for the $${{\varvec{M/G/1/K}}}$$ queues with subexponential service times , 2014, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[14]  B. Melamed,et al.  Traffic modeling for telecommunications networks , 1994, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Sabrina Kruger,et al.  Queueing Theory With Applications To Packet Telecommunication , 2016 .

[16]  Jörg Liebeherr,et al.  Stochastic Bandwidth Estimation in Networks With Random Service , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  Giuseppe Piro,et al.  Downlink Packet Scheduling in LTE Cellular Networks: Key Design Issues and a Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  J. Segers,et al.  Tails of random sums of a heavy-tailed number of light-tailed terms , 2007, math/0703022.