Advancing the design and construction quality control of flexible pavements

Abstract The paper presents several advanced features that can be used in the process of pavement design and construction quality control. The models for predicting the pavement performance in the latest version of mechanistic empirical pavement design guide form the basis of the proposed system. In order to add the new features, it was necessary to make simplifications concerning the moisture distribution in the unbound materials and the ageing/oxidation of the upper asphalt concrete (AC) layers. The add-ins to the program include: (1) An analytical reliability analysis where the variability of the performance prediction components is computed from the variability of the pavement parameters; (2) An improved simulation of the temperature distribution in the AC layers during the design period; (3) An option for adding an overlay during the design period, to simulate maintenance or stage construction and (4) The possibility to use a 2D finite element analysis with nonlinear and cross-anisotropic materials, in addition to the well-established linear elastic analysis. The proposed system runs every hour of the design period and computes the fatigue bottom-up cracking, rutting in all pavement layers and international roughness index. It runs very fast, less than one minute in the linear analysis and less than 30 min in the nonlinear case. Few cases are presented to illustrate the benefits of the above add-ins.

[1]  M. Harr Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analyses , 1989 .

[2]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  Importance of Nonlinear Anisotropic Modeling of Granular Base for Predicting Maximum Viscoelastic Pavement Responses under Moving Vehicular Loading , 2013 .

[3]  John T Harvey,et al.  CalME: A New Mechanistic-Empirical Design Program for Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation , 2010 .

[4]  P. C. Paris,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws , 1963 .

[5]  Fujie Zhou,et al.  Mechanistic-Empirical Asphalt Overlay Thickness Design and Analysis System , 2009 .

[6]  Jacob Uzan,et al.  PERMANENT DEFORMATION IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 2004 .

[7]  Jacob Uzan,et al.  A simplified flexible pavement guide with analytical reliability analysis , 2014 .

[8]  S. Erkens,et al.  CRACKING IN ASPHALT CONCRETE , 1996 .

[9]  Charles W. Schwartz Effect of Stress‐Dependent Base Layer on the Superposition of Flexible Pavement Solutions , 2002 .

[10]  Jacob Uzan,et al.  Evaluation of Fatigue Cracking , 1997 .

[11]  Rongzong Wu,et al.  CalME, a Mechanistic–Empirical Program to Analyze and Design Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation , 2010 .

[12]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE PREDICTION MODELS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASPHALT BINDERS AND PAVING MIXES , 1993 .

[13]  André Molenaar,et al.  Application of fracture mechanics principles to analyse cracking in asphalt concrete , 1996 .

[14]  Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.  Two-point estimates in probabilities , 1981 .

[15]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Cross-Anisotropic Characterization of Unbound Granular Materials , 2001 .

[16]  Final Document,et al.  Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design OF NEW AND REHABILITATED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES FINAL DOCUMENT APPENDIX QQ : STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODELS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS NCHRP , 2004 .

[17]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Models for Predicting Reflection Cracking of Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays , 2010 .