Count Models Based on Weibull Interarrival Times

The widespread popularity and use of both the Poisson and the negative binomial models for count data arise, in part, from their derivation as the number of arrivals in a given time period assuming exponentially distributed interarrival times (without and with heterogeneity in the underlying base rates, respectively). However, with that clean theory come some limitations including limited flexibility in the assumed underlying arrival rate distribution and the inability to model underdispersed counts (variance less than the mean). Although extant research has addressed some of these issues, there still remain numerous valuable extensions. In this research, we present a model that, due to computational tractability, was previously thought to be infeasible. In particular, we introduce here a generalized model for count data based upon an assumed Weibull interarrival process that nests the Poisson and negative binomial models as special cases. The computational intractability is overcome by deriving the Weibull count model using a polynomial expansion which then allows for closed-form inference (integration term-by-term) when incorporating heterogeneity due to the conjugacy of the expansion and a commonly employed gamma distribution. In addition, we demonstrate that this new Weibull count model can (1) model both over- and underdispersed count data, (2) allow covariates to be introduced in a straightforward manner through the hazard function, and (3) be computed in standard software.

[1]  W. Feller On a General Class of "Contagious" Distributions , 1943 .

[2]  Christian Gourieroux,et al.  A count data model with unobserved heterogeneity , 1997 .

[3]  J. Sethuraman,et al.  How Pooling Failure Data May Reverse Increasing Failure Rates , 1995 .

[4]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Reliability , 1965 .

[5]  J. Lawless Regression Methods for Poisson Process Data , 1987 .

[6]  G. S. Mudholkar,et al.  A Generalization of the Weibull Distribution with Application to the Analysis of Survival Data , 1996 .

[7]  A. G. Arbous,et al.  Accident statistics and the concept of accident-proneness , 1951 .

[8]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[9]  Pravin K. Trivedi ECONOMETRIC MODELS OF EVENT COUNTS , 1997 .

[10]  A. Colin Cameron,et al.  Bivariate Count Data Regression Using Series Expansions: With Applications , 1997 .

[11]  H. Friedl Econometric Analysis of Count Data , 2002 .

[12]  G. Altmann,et al.  Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions , 1999 .

[13]  R. Winkelmann Duration Dependence and Dispersion in Count-Data Models , 1995 .

[14]  Vladimir E. Bening,et al.  Generalized Poisson Models and their Applications in Insurance and Finance , 2002 .

[15]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Closed-form Bayesian inferences for the logit model via polynomial expansions , 2006 .

[16]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[17]  X. Sheldon Lin,et al.  Generalized Poisson Models and Their Applications in Insurance and Finance , 2004 .

[18]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Bayesian Inference for the Beta-Binomial Distribution via Polynomial Expansions , 2002 .

[19]  G. King,et al.  Variance Specification in Event Count Models: From Restrictive Assumptions to a Generalized Estimator , 1989 .

[20]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Bayesian Inference for the Negative Binomial Distribution via Polynomial Expansions , 2002 .

[21]  T. Minka,et al.  A useful distribution for fitting discrete data: revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution , 2005 .

[22]  K. Subrahmaniam On a general class of contagious distributions: The Pascal-Poisson distribution , 1966 .

[23]  J. Mullahy Specification and testing of some modified count data models , 1986 .

[24]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .