Combined Effects of Routine Blood Pressure Lowering and Intensive Glucose Control on Macrovascular and Microvascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE To assess the magnitude and independence of the effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control on clinical outcomes in patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a multicenter, factorial randomized trial of perindopril-indapamide versus placebo (double-blind comparison) and intensive glucose control with a gliclazide MR–based regimen (target A1C ≤6.5%) versus standard glucose control (open comparison) in 11,140 participants with type 2 diabetes who participated in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. Annual event rates and risks of major macrovascular and microvascular events considered jointly and separately, renal events, and death during an average 4.3 years of follow-up were assessed, using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS There was no interaction between the effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control for any of the prespecified clinical outcomes (all P > 0.1): the separate effects of the two interventions for the renal outcomes and death appeared to be additive on the log scale. Compared with neither intervention, combination treatment reduced the risk of new or worsening nephropathy by 33% (95% CI 12–50%, P = 0.005), new onset of macroalbuminuria by 54% (35–68%, P < 0.0001), and new onset of microalbuminuria by 26% (17–34%). Combination treatment was associated with an 18% reduction in the risk of all-cause death (1–32%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The effects of routine blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control were independent of one another. When combined, they produced additional reductions in clinically relevant outcomes.

[1]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY GROUP. EFFECTS OF INTENSIVE GLUCOSE LOWERING IN TYPE 2 DIABETES , 2010 .

[2]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Schinner Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[4]  R. Holman,et al.  10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Jardine,et al.  The Relationship between Proteinuria and Coronary Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[6]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Diederick Grobbee,et al.  Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Silvio E. Inzucchi,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008 , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[9]  J. Dora,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008 , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[10]  Anushka Patel,et al.  Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Holman,et al.  Additive effects of glycaemia and blood pressure exposure on risk of complications in type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study (UKPDS 75) , 2006, Diabetologia.

[12]  Simon Davies,et al.  Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[13]  S. Piantadosi Clinical Trials : A Methodologic Perspective , 2005 .

[14]  B. Brenner,et al.  Albuminuria, a Therapeutic Target for Cardiovascular Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  Oluf Pedersen,et al.  Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Collins,et al.  Study rationale and design of ADVANCE: Action in diabetes and vascular disease - Preterax and diamicron MR controlled evaluation , 2001 .

[17]  Advance Management Committee Study Rationale and Design of ADVANCE: Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease – preterax and diamicron MR controlled evaluation , 2001, Diabetologia.

[18]  M. Shichiri,et al.  Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[19]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[20]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  R. Holman,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. , 1998 .

[23]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[24]  M. Hanefeld,et al.  Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up , 1996, Diabetologia.

[25]  E. Araki,et al.  Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. , 1995, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[26]  J. Neaton,et al.  Diabetes, Other Risk Factors, and 12-Yr Cardiovascular Mortality for Men Screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial , 1993, Diabetes Care.