Network governance for large‐scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture

Large-scale natural resource conservation initiatives are increasingly adopting a network governance framework to respond to the ecological, social, and political challenges of contemporary environmental governance. A network approach offers new modes of management that allow resource managers and others to transcend a single institution, organization, resource, or landscape and engage in conservation that is multi-species and multi-jurisdictional. However, there are challenges to network governance in large-scale conservation efforts, which we address by focusing on how special interests can capture networks and shape the goals, objectives, and outcomes of initiatives. The term “network capture” is used here to describe an array of strategies that direct the processes and outcomes of large-scale initiatives in ways that advance a group's positions, concerns, or economic interests. We outline how new stakeholders emerge from these management processes, and how the ease of information sharing can blur stakeholder positions and lead to competing knowledge claims. We conclude by reasserting the benefits of network governance while acknowledging the unique challenges that networks present.

[1]  Kirsten M. Leong,et al.  The New Governance Era: Implications for Collaborative Conservation and Adaptive Management in Department of the Interior Agencies , 2011 .

[2]  D. Peters.  Ecology in a connected world: a vision for a “network of networks” , 2008 .

[3]  Brian J. Gareau.  Dangerous holes in global environmental governance: The roles of neoliberal discourse, science, and California agriculture in the Montreal Protocol. , 2011 .

[4]  D. Brockington,et al.  Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction , 2007 .

[5]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  “We Don’t Take the Pledge”: Environmentality and environmental skepticism at the epicenter of US wind energy development , 2012 .

[6]  Sue V. Briggs,et al.  Command and control in natural resource management: Revisiting Holling and Meffe , 2003 .

[7]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Future landscapes: managing within complexity , 2012 .

[8]  C. Holling,et al.  Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management , 1996 .

[9]  L. Scarlett,et al.  Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation , 2016 .

[10]  U. Kreuter,et al.  Groundwater Supply in Texas: Private Land Considerations in a Rule-of-Capture State , 2004 .

[11]  Jocelyn L. Aycrigg,et al.  Representation of Ecological Systems within the Protected Areas Network of the Continental United States , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Mark T. Imperial,et al.  Understanding leadership in a world of shared problems: advancing network governance in large landscape conservation , 2016 .

[13]  L. Ogden.  The Everglades Ecosystem and the Politics of Nature , 2008 .

[14]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[15]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[16]  Liba Pejchar,et al.  Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Damien Contessa,et al.  Swamplife: People, Gators, and Mangroves Entangled in the Everglades , 2013 .

[18]  B. Crona,et al.  Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? , 2006 .

[19]  R. Fletcher.  Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate , 2010 .

[20]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[21]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority , 2004 .

[22]  J. Mccarthy.  Neoliberalism and the Politics of Alternatives: Community Forestry in British Columbia and the United States , 2006 .

[23]  Shawn Johnson,et al.  Networks and landscapes: a framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale , 2016 .

[24]  PETER LEIGH TAYLOR,et al.  In the Market But Not of It: Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewardship Council Certification as Market-Based Social Change , 2005 .

[25]  J. Davies.  Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique , 2012 .

[26]  Klaus Leidorf.  Environmental Governance, , 2007 .

[27]  N. Castree.  Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment: A Synthesis and Evaluation of the Research , 2010 .

[28]  J. N. Clarke,et al.  Staking out the terrain : power and performance among natural resource agencies , 1996 .

[29]  D. Schlosberg.  Networks and mobile arrangements: Organisational innovation in the US environmental justice movement , 1999 .

[30]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[31]  M..  Misrepresenting Communities : The Politics of Community-Based Rural Ecotourism in Gales Point Manatee , Belize 1 , 2022 .

[32]  Steve Vanderheiden.  Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences , 2009 .

[33]  M. Pasqualetti.  Opposing Wind Energy Landscapes: A Search for Common Cause , 2011 .

[34]  H. A. Walker,et al.  Internet-Based Approaches to Building Stakeholder Networks for Conservation and Natural Resource Management , 2015, Environmental Management.

[35]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[36]  R. DeFries,et al.  Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World , 2013, Ecology and Society.

[37]  Faith Sternlieb,et al.  A question of fit: reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  R. P. Bixler,et al.  Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non–State Market–Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule–Making Authority , 2002 .

[40]  Jill M. Belsky,et al.  Misrepresenting Communities: The Politics of Community‐Based Rural Ecotourism in Gales Point Manatee, Belize1 , 2009 .

[41]  D. Decker,et al.  From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management , 1996 .

[42]  G. North,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on Texas Water: A White Paper Assessment of the Past, Present and Future and Recommendations for Action , 2010, Texas Water Journal.

[43]  Theresa M. Jedd,et al.  Accountability in Networked Governance: Learning from a case of landscape-scale forest conservation , 2015 .

[44]  M. Gibbs.  Network governance in fisheries , 2008 .

[45]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  Looking Good and Doing Good: Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Power. , 1997 .

[46]  Christian A. Smith.  The Role of State Wildlife Professionals Under the Public Trust Doctrine , 2011 .

[47]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[48]  Pam Nichols.  From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement , 2001 .