Techniques for field application of lingual ultrasound imaging

Techniques are discussed for using ultrasound for lingual imaging in field‐related applications. The greatest challenges we have faced distinguishing the field setting from the laboratory setting are the lack of controlled head/transducer movement, and the related issue of tissue compression. Two experiments are reported. First, a pilot study identifies important factors in controlling head/transducer movement in field settings. Second, an Optotrak/ultrasound study reports the range of head movement in an optimal field‐like setting within and across varying phonetic contexts, as well as the effect of tongue tissue compression on tongue image data. Results suggest that with a simple arrangement involving a head rest or surface, a fixed transducer, and careful design and presentation of stimuli, reliable lingual ultrasound data can be collected in the field.

[1]  Bryan Gick,et al.  The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[2]  R R Miethke,et al.  Ultrasonographic measurement of tongue movement during swallowing. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  M. Stone A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[4]  M. Stone,et al.  Automatic motion analysis of the tongue surface from ultrasound image sequences , 1998, Proceedings. Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis (Cat. No.98EX162).

[5]  Takaaki Kuratate,et al.  Linking facial animation, head motion and speech acoustics , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[6]  F Lundström,et al.  Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.