Derivation of an Observer Model Adapted to Irregular Signals Based on Convolution Channels
暂无分享,去创建一个
Craig K. Abbey | Miguel P. Eckstein | Francis R. Verdun | Pontus Timberg | Iván Díaz | François O. Bochud | Cyril Castella
[1] Craig K. Abbey,et al. A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .
[2] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Modeling Visual Detection Tasks in Correlated Image Noise with Linear Model Observers , 2000 .
[3] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Human vs model observers in anatomic backgrounds , 1998, Medical Imaging.
[4] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[5] Harrison H Barrett,et al. Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[6] H H Barrett,et al. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[7] RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al. SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .
[8] Miguel P Eckstein,et al. Adaptive detection mechanisms in globally statistically nonstationary-oriented noise. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[9] Harold L. Kundel,et al. Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 1. Physics and Psychophysics , 2000 .
[10] H. Wilson,et al. Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.
[11] D. Gabor,et al. Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .
[12] M P Eckstein,et al. Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[13] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Mass detection in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a model observer study , 2009, Medical Imaging.
[14] H H Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[15] A. Burgess. Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[16] Walter Huda,et al. How do lesion size and random noise affect detection performance in digital mammography? , 2006, Academic radiology.
[17] Miguel P Eckstein,et al. Frequency tuning of perceptual templates changes with noise magnitude. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[18] D J Field,et al. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[19] Scott J. Daly,et al. Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.
[20] D. G. Albrecht,et al. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.