The profit efficiency of small US commercial banks

Abstract This study investigates the profit efficiency (PROFEFF) of small banks (those under $500 million in total assets) for 1990–96. Assuming that small banks and large banks use the same production technology, we find, consistent with Berger and Mester [J. Bank. Finance 21 (1997) 875], that small banks are more profit efficient than large banks. Small banks in non-metropolitan statistical areas (non-MSA) areas are consistently more profit efficient than small banks in MSAs. Cross-sectional analysis of the correlates of the PROFEFF estimates suggests that structure–performance factors, relationship–development factors, and expense-preference behavior play an important role in explaining the PROFEFF of small US commercial banks.

[1]  Arnoud Boot.  Relationship Banking: What Do We Know? , 2000 .

[2]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Are Scale Economies in Banking Elusive or Illusive , 2001 .

[3]  Richard J. Sullivan,et al.  Who's minding the store? Motivating and monitoring hired managers at small, closely held commercial banks , 2001 .

[4]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  Expense Preference and Managerial Control: the Case of the Banking Firm , 1980 .

[5]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  What Explains the Dramatic Changes in Cost and Profit Performance of the U.S. Banking Industry? , 1999 .

[6]  L. Nakamura.  Commercial bank information: implications for the structure of banking , 1991 .

[7]  I. Hasan,et al.  The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach , 1998 .

[8]  Seyed Mehdian,et al.  The Comparative Efficiency Performance of Small and Large US Commercial Banks in the Pre- and Post-Deregulation Eras , 1995 .

[9]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions? , 1997 .

[10]  Timothy H. Hannan.  Foundations of the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking , 1991 .

[11]  R. Arnould,et al.  Agency costs in banking firms: An analysis of expense preference behavior , 1985 .

[12]  Douglas A. McManus,et al.  Resolving the Scale Efficiency Puzzle in Banking , 1993 .

[13]  S. Rhoades.  Monopoly and Expense Preference Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of a Behavioralist Hypothesis , 1980 .

[14]  S. Rhoades,et al.  Market power and firm risk: A test of the `quiet life' hypothesis , 1982 .

[15]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[16]  Timothy H. Hannan.  Bank commercial loan markets and the role of market structure: evidence from surveys of commercial lending , 1991 .

[17]  Douglas W. Diamond.  Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring , 1984 .

[18]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Structural change in banking , 1993 .

[19]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Economies of Scale and Scope at Large Commercial Banks: Evidence from the Fourier Flexible Functional Form , 1996 .

[20]  A. Greenspan.  Statement by Alan Greenspan, Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, February 26, 1997 , 1996 .

[21]  V. Salas,et al.  Strategic competition in retail banking under expense preference behavior , 2000 .

[22]  D. Runkle,et al.  Size and performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory , 1993 .

[23]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions? , 1997 .

[24]  James A. Verbrugge,et al.  Small bank loan quality in a deregulated environment: the information advantage hypothesis , 2001 .

[25]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Are Scale Economies in Banking Elusive or Illusive? Evidence Obtained by Incorporating Capital Structure and Risk-Taking into Models of Bank Production , 2000 .

[26]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry: A Test of the Quiet Life and Related Hypotheses , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[27]  Loretta J. Mester,et al.  Checking Accounts and Bank Monitoring , 1998 .

[28]  Lawrence B. Pulley,et al.  Banks' Responses to Deregulation: Profits, Technology, and Efficiency , 1997 .

[29]  R. Gilbert,et al.  Bank Market Structure and Competition: A Survey , 1984 .

[30]  Robert Deyoung,et al.  Foreign-Owned Banks in the United States: Earning Market Share or Buying It? , 1996 .

[31]  M. Petersen,et al.  The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships , 1994 .

[32]  L. Nakamura.  Recent research in commercial banking: information and lending , 1993 .

[33]  J. Madura.  Financial Markets and Institutions , 1989 .