The Force-Feedback Coupling Effect in Bilateral Tele-Impedance

In this paper, we introduce and explore a concept called coupling effect, which pertains to the influence of force feedback on the commanded stiffness that is voluntarily controlled by the operator through the stiffness interface during bilateral tele-impedance. The degree of coupling effect depends on the type of interface used to control the impedance of the remote robot. In case of muscle activity based stiffness command interfaces, the force feedback can invoke involuntary changes in the commanded stiffness due to human reflexes. These involuntary changes can be either beneficial (e.g., during position tracking) or detrimental (e.g., during force tracking) to the task performance on the remote robot side. To investigate the coupling effect in different types of stiffness command interfaces (i.e., coupled and decoupled), we conduct an experimental study in which participants are asked to perform position and force tracking tasks. The results show that in both position and force tracking tasks a lower tracking error of the reference stiffness is obtained with a decoupled interface (p<0.001). However, the unexpected force perturbation yields lower absolute position error when using a coupled interface (p=0.0091), which indicates a specific benefit of the coupling effect. Finally, a lower absolute force error is found in the force tracking task by using the decoupled interface (p<0.001), which indicates a specific downside of the coupling effect.

[1]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  A Task-Specific Analysis of the Benefit of Haptic Shared Control During Telemanipulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[2]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Unifying bilateral teleoperation and tele-impedance for enhanced user experience , 2020, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Tadej Petric,et al.  Robotic assembly solution by human-in-the-loop teaching method based on real-time stiffness modulation , 2018, Auton. Robots.

[4]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Is grip strength related to neuromuscular admittance during steering wheel control? , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Cartesian impedance control of redundant robots: recent results with the DLR-light-weight-arms , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[7]  Enhao Zheng,et al.  Toward a Human-Machine Interface Based on Electrical Impedance Tomography for Robotic Manipulator Control , 2019, 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[8]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Measuring Neuromuscular Control Dynamics During Car Following With Continuous Haptic Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A reduced-complexity description of arm endpoint stiffness with applications to teleimpedance control , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[11]  Tadej Petric,et al.  Human-in-the-loop approach for teaching robot assembly tasks using impedance control interface , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[12]  Tadej Petric,et al.  Teaching robots to cooperate with humans in dynamic manipulation tasks based on multi-modal human-in-the-loop approach , 2014, Auton. Robots.

[13]  N. Hogan.  Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[14]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Tele-impedance with force feedback under communication time delay , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[15]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body–machine interface , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Ruifeng Li,et al.  Interface Design of a Physical Human–Robot Interaction System for Human Impedance Adaptive Skill Transfer , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  H. Kambara,et al.  Endpoint stiffness magnitude increases linearly with a stronger power grasp , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Luka Peternel,et al.  A shared control method for online human-in-the-loop robot learning based on Locally Weighted Regression , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).