End-users as co-developers for novel green products and services – an exploratory case study analysis of the innovation process in incumbent firms

Abstract Studies focusing on green innovation have shown that companies can gain a competitive advantage by collaborating with multiple stakeholders in the innovation process. Since novel green innovations are often systemic in nature and require changes in consumption behavior, end-user integration along the innovation process may be particularly relevant for the success of such products and services. The main aim of this paper is therefore to add to our understanding of the role of users in the green innovation processes of incumbent firms. The comparative case study in the context of e-mobility and smart housing outlines the methods used by three European incumbent firms to integrate users at different stages of the innovation process as well as their motivation and benefit. The findings show that users were basically co-developing the novel green product or service from the beginning. In the cases under review, early and constant end-user integration served as a risk-management tool, since it uncovered behavioral changes induced by the innovations among potential future users. This helped companies to overcome risk aversion towards the development of genuinely new green products and services and to bring these to the market. Field trials similar to living labs proved to be of particular importance for gaining insight into the everyday lifestyle of users. Thereby, the paper stresses an approach to green innovation in incumbent firms, which has not been given much attention in literature before. In addition, our cases show that the benefits of user integration can not only be high for rather incremental green innovations but also for genuinely new innovation in highly technological industries. User integration helped the case companies to uncover behavioral changes in the consumption phase and strengthening market acceptance. We conclude that firms may profit from an extensive user input throughout all phases of the innovation process to develop novel green products and services, and call for further research on how firms can overcome entry barriers to user integration in green product development in the future.

[1]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Business Models and Technological Innovation , 2013 .

[2]  Erik L. Olson Perspective: The Green Innovation Value Chain: A Tool for Evaluating the Diffusion Prospects of Green Products , 2013 .

[3]  Alan Irwin,et al.  Clean technology, successful innovation and the greening of industry: A case‐study analysis , 1992 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[5]  Fabienne Picard,et al.  Environmental constraints, Product-Service Systems development and impacts on innovation management: learning from manufacturing firms in the French context , 2013 .

[6]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  User innovation in sustainable home energy technologies , 2013 .

[7]  Thomas Budde Christensen,et al.  Can innovative business models overcome resistance to electric vehicles?: Better Place and battery electric cars in Denmark , 2012 .

[8]  Halina Szejnwald Brown,et al.  Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building , 2008 .

[9]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations , 2013 .

[10]  Ki‐Hoon Lee,et al.  Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry , 2011 .

[11]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Consumer participation in sustainable technology development , 2005 .

[12]  Harald Rohracher,et al.  User-led Innovations and Participation Processes: Lessons from Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[13]  M. Wagner The links of sustainable competitiveness and innovation with openness and user integration: an empirical analysis , 2009 .

[14]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[15]  Lewis Akenji,et al.  Sustainable production, consumption, and livelihoods: global and regional research perspectives , 2014 .

[16]  David Dallinger,et al.  New business models for electric cars: A holistic approach , 2011 .

[17]  C. Castaldi,et al.  Co-Innovation By Kibs In Environmental Services — A Knowledge-Based Perspective , 2013 .

[18]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Sustainable innovation in wastewater management: lessons for nutrient recovery and reuse , 2013 .

[19]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[20]  P. Keinz,et al.  Exploring the Nature and Implementation Process of User-Centric Business Models , 2011 .

[21]  E. Hippel,et al.  The Age of the Consumer-Innovator , 2011 .

[22]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[24]  S. Sangle,et al.  Adoption of cleaner technology for climate proactivity: a technology–firm–stakeholder framework , 2010 .

[25]  G. Seyfang Cultivating Carrots and Community: Local Organic Food and Sustainable Consumption , 2007, Environmental Values.

[26]  John A. Quelch,et al.  How to Market in a Downturn , 2009 .

[27]  Nizar Abdelkafi,et al.  BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATIONS FOR ELECTRIC MOBILITY — WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM EXISTING BUSINESS MODEL PATTERNS? , 2013 .

[28]  K. Weber Transforming Large Socio-technical Systems towards Sustainability: On the Role of Users and Future Visions for the Uptake of City Logistics and Combined Heat and Power Generation , 2003 .

[29]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  A smoke-free kitchen: initiating community based co-production for cleaner cooking and cuts in carbon emissions , 2013 .

[30]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Developing Sustainable New Products in the Textile and Upholstered Furniture Industries: Role of External Integrative Capabilities , 2013 .

[31]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[32]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[33]  A. Kolk,et al.  Business Models for Sustainable Technologies: Exploring Business Model Evolution in the Case of Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[34]  E. Hippel Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users , 2007 .

[35]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies , 2010 .

[36]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  A milieu for innovation : defining living labs , 2009 .

[37]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Crowdsourcing for Goodness Sake: Impact of Incentive Preference on Contribution Behavior for Social Innovation , 2012 .

[38]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25 , 2006 .

[39]  E. Mlecnik,et al.  Opportunities for supplier-led systemic innovation in highly energy-efficient housing , 2013 .

[40]  N. Franke,et al.  Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market , 2004 .

[41]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development , 2013 .

[42]  P. González Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry , 2005 .

[43]  Jan Bosch,et al.  User involvement throughout the innovation process in high-tech industries , 2015 .

[44]  S. Markham,et al.  Product Development as Core Competence: How Formal Product Development Practices Differ for Radical, More Innovative, and Incremental Product Innovations† , 2014 .

[45]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[46]  Katja Hutter,et al.  User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Sali Li,et al.  Insights and New Directions from Demand-Side Approaches to Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management Research , 2012 .

[48]  V. Marchi ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2012 .

[49]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Integrating Multiple Stakeholder Issues in New Product Development: An Exploration , 2010 .

[50]  Esther Hoffmann,et al.  Consumer integration in sustainable product development , 2007 .

[51]  M. Cortimiglia,et al.  Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review , 2014 .

[52]  G. Feola,et al.  Success and Failure of Grassroots Innovations for Addressing Climate Change: The Case of the Transition Movement , 2014 .

[53]  Marlen Arnold,et al.  Open innovation in urban energy systems , 2012 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[55]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf Keep the Door Open: Innovating Toward a More Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[56]  Holger Rohn,et al.  User-integrated innovation in sustainable LivingLabs : an experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems , 2015 .

[57]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions , 2011 .

[58]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  Co-creating sustainability: cross-sector university collaborations for driving sustainable urban transformations , 2013 .

[59]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .