Common language of all people: The innate language of thought

Esteemed Colleagues, Dear Friends! I am so pleased to be able to meet with you that I want to take this opportunity to present to you a talk about what is for me the most important thing: the common human language, the innate semantic system shared by all people. Russia is a country where semantics has traditionally been particularly strong (as has mathematics), and where scholars have always devoted themselves to the study of meaning more than elsewhere. Russia is also a country of obshchenie—an essential and uniquely Russian concept which has no equivalents in other languages. (The anthropologist Dale Pesmen (2000) tried to explain it for English readers with the word communion, and in translating Bakhtin’s frequent references to obshchenie alternated dialogue with communion.) Russia is a country of close and strong personal relationships which often last a lifetime even when fate (sud’ba) disperses people to the furthest corners of the world. And finally, Russia is a country of arguments, of intense arguments about abstract subjects. Of this, you may remember, Turgenev had something to say. I myself have written an article “Arguing in Russian,” which was published in the most recent number of The Russian Journal of Communication. It is with great joy that I am now returning to the “obshchenie,” the discussions and arguments, in which I was fortunate to be able to participate in Moscow more than forty years ago.

[1]  L. Couturat,et al.  Opuscules Et Fragments Inédits , 1903 .

[2]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[3]  Andrzej Bogusławski A note on Apresjanˊs concept of "Polish school of semantics" with an appendix , 2003 .

[4]  Robert M. Harnish,et al.  Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse : a Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer , 2001 .

[5]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective , 2007 .

[6]  Keith Allan,et al.  Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical evidence from the Romance languages , 2008 .

[7]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Shape and colour in language and thought , 2007 .

[8]  Marcelo Dascal,et al.  Leibniz, language, signs, and thought , 1986 .

[9]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  English: Meaning and Culture , 2006 .

[10]  Burton Raffel,et al.  After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation , 1975 .

[11]  G. W. Leibniz,et al.  Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz , 1875 .

[12]  U. Eco The Search for the Perfect Language , 1997 .

[13]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect and modality , 2009 .

[14]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and empirical findings , 2002 .

[15]  Paul Ziff,et al.  Semantic Analysis , 1960 .

[16]  G. Leibniz,et al.  New Essays on Human Understanding. , 1981 .

[17]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantic and lexical universals : theory and empirical findings , 1994 .

[18]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology , 2007 .

[19]  David Bullock,et al.  NSM + LDOCE: A Non-Circular Dictionary of English , 2011 .

[20]  G. P. Henderson,et al.  Leibniz : logic and metaphysics , 1966 .

[21]  Anna Wierzbicka Experience, Evidence, and Sense: The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English , 2010 .

[22]  Cliff Goddard Semantic molecules and semantic complexity (with special reference to " environmental" molecules) , 2010 .

[23]  Anna Wierzbicka Experience, Evidence, and Sense , 2010 .

[24]  Jurij D. Apresjan,et al.  Principles of Systematic Lexicography , 2008 .

[25]  Cliff Goddard The conceptual semantics of numbers and counting: An NSM analysis , 2009 .