Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension

We have investigated how the control of hand transport and of hand aperture are coordinated in prehensile movements by delivering mechanical perturbations to the hand transport component and looking for coordinated adjustments in hand aperture. An electric actuator attached to the subject's right arm randomly pulled the subject backwards, away from the target, or pushed them towards it, during a quarter of the experimental trials. A compensatory adjustment of hand aperture followed the immediate, mechanical effects of the perturbation of hand transport. The adjustment appeared to return the subject towards a stereotyped spatial relation between hand aperture and hand transport. These spatial patterns suggest how the two components may be coordinated during prehension. A simple model of this coordination, based on coupled position feedback systems, is presented.

[1]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Insights into the reach to grasp movement , 1994 .

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[6]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  P. Morasso.  Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  N. Hogan.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Hollerbach,et al.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Kelso,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[15]  T. Flash,et al.  The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  A M Wing,et al.  Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Robotic grasping and fine manipulation , 1985 .

[18]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. , 1988, Psychological review.

[21]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.