A matter of style? Driver attributional 'style' in accounting for the driving of others as protective or as predisposing drivers towards retaliatory aggressive driving

Driver cognitions about aggressive driving of others are potentially important to the development of evidence-based interventions. Previous research has suggested that perceptions that other drivers are intentionally aggressive may influence recipient driver anger and subsequent aggressive responses. Accordingly, recent research on aggressive driving has attempted to distinguish between intentional and unintentional motives in relation to problem driving behaviours. This study assessed driver cognitive responses to common potentially provocative hypothetical driving scenarios to explore the role of attributions in driver aggression. A convenience sample of 315 general drivers 16–64 yrs (M = 34) completed a survey measuring trait aggression (Aggression Questionnaire AQ), driving anger (Driving Anger Scale, DAS), and a proxy measure of aggressive driving behaviour (Australian Propensity for Angry Driving AusPADS). Purpose designed items asked for drivers’ ‘most likely’ thought in response to AusPADS scenarios. Response options were equivalent to causal attributions about the other driver. Patterns in endorsements of attribution responses to the scenarios suggested that drivers tended to adopt a particular perception of the driving of others regardless of the depicted circumstances: a driving attributional style. No gender or age differences were found for attributional style. Significant differences were detected between attributional styles for driving anger and endorsement of aggressive responses to driving situations. Drivers who attributed the on-road event to the other being an incompetent or dangerous driver had significantly higher driving anger scores and endorsed significantly more aggressive driving responses than those drivers who attributed other driver’s behaviour to mistakes. In contrast, drivers who gave others the ‘benefit of the doubt’ endorsed significantly less aggressive driving responses than either of these other two groups, suggesting that this style is protective.

[1]  N. Pachana,et al.  Adapting the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale for use in Australian research. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Nancy A Pachana,et al.  Validation of the Australian Propensity for Angry Driving Scale (Aus-PADS). , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  L. Rowell Huesmann,et al.  An information processing model for the development of aggression , 1988 .

[4]  Judy J. Fleiter,et al.  How do other people influence your driving speed? Exploring the 'who' and the 'how' of social influences on speeding from a qualitative perspective , 2010 .

[5]  J. Greeson,et al.  Mindfulness predicts less texting while driving among young adults: Examining attention- and emotion-regulation motives as potential mediators. , 2011, Personality and individual differences.

[6]  A. Lennon,et al.  Do drivers respond emotionally and behaviourally differently to an intentionally anger provoking driving situation than to an ambiguous, but potentially provocative, one? Results of a self-report survey. , 2012 .

[7]  Thomas W Britt,et al.  Attributions and personality as predictors of the road rage response. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  The Role of Attributions and Anger in Aggressive Driving Behaviours , 2005 .

[9]  A. Buss,et al.  The aggression questionnaire. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[11]  J. Archer,et al.  Measuring aggression: Self-reports, partner reports, and responses to provoking scenarios , 2001 .

[12]  Elisabeth Wells-Parker,et al.  An exploratory study of the relationship between road rage and crash experience in a representative sample of US drivers. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Barry Watson,et al.  "Teaching them a lesson?" A qualitative exploration of underlying motivations for driver aggression. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Mark J. King,et al.  Understanding Speeding in School Zones in Malaysia and Australia Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour: The Potential Role of Mindfulness , 2011 .

[15]  Graham Fraine,et al.  ‘You’re a bad driver but I just made a mistake’ : attribution differences between the ‘victims’ and ‘perpetrators’ of scenario-based aggressive driving incidents , 2011 .

[16]  Barry C. Watson,et al.  Coping with aggressive driving : driver accounts of how they manage themselves and others to reduce conflict on the road , 2012 .

[17]  C. Raymond Bingham,et al.  Towards a comprehensive model of driver aggression : a review of the literature and directions for the future , 2011 .

[18]  R. S. Lynch,et al.  Development of a Driving Anger Scale , 1994, Psychological reports.

[19]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Measuring road rage: development of the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale , 2001 .

[20]  Ioni M. Lewis,et al.  Significant Others, Who Are They? Examining Normative Influences on Speeding , 2006 .

[21]  Mark J M Sullman,et al.  A comparison of the Driving Anger Scale and the Propensity for Angry Driving Scale. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Christine M. Wickens,et al.  Understanding driver anger and aggression: attributional theory in the driving environment. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.