STOC Free: An Innovative Framework to Compare Probability of Freedom From Infection in Heterogeneous Control Programmes

The existence, stage of eradication and design of control programmes (CPs) for diseases that are not regulated by the EU differ between Member States. When freedom from infection is reached or being pursued, safe trade is essential to protect or reach that status. The aim of STOC free, a collaborative project between six countries, is to develop and validate a framework that enables a transparent and standardized comparison of confidence of freedom for CPs across herds, regions or countries. The framework consists of a model combined with a tool to facilitate the collection of the necessary parameters. All relevant actions taken in a CP are included in a Bayesian network model, which allows prior distributions for most parameters. In addition, frequency of occurrence and risk estimates for factors that influence either the probability of introduction or temporary misclassification leading to delayed detection of the infection are included in the model. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is used as an example disease. Many countries have CPs in place for BVDV and although elements of the CPs are similar, biosecurity measures and testing protocols, including types of tests and testing frequency, as well as target groups, differ widely. Although the initially developed framework is based on BVDV, the aim is to make it sufficiently generic to be adaptable to CPs for other diseases and possibly other species. Thus, STOC free will result in a single general framework, adaptable to multiple disease CPs, which aims to enhance the safety of trade.

[1]  H. Houe Epidemiology of bovine viral diarrhea virus. , 1995, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[2]  H. Houe Epidemiological features and economical importance of bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) infections. , 1999, Veterinary microbiology.

[3]  M Holzhauer,et al.  [Risk of Echinococcus granulosus becoming endemic in Dutch cattle]. , 2009, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[4]  D. Heisey,et al.  Using Auxiliary Information to Improve Wildlife Disease Surveillance When Infected Animals Are Not Detected: A Bayesian Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  A. Lindberg Bovine viral Diarrhoea virus infections and its control. A review , 2003, The Veterinary quarterly.

[6]  T. de Waal,et al.  Bovine besnoitiosis (Besnoitia besnoiti) in an Irish dairy herd , 2016, Veterinary Record.

[7]  S. More,et al.  Defining output-based standards to achieve and maintain tuberculosis freedom in farmed deer, with reference to member states of the European Union. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[8]  A. Cameron The consequences of risk-based surveillance: Developing output-based standards for surveillance to demonstrate freedom from disease. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  L. Alban,et al.  Comparison of output-based approaches used to substantiate bovine tuberculosis free status in Danish cattle herds. , 2015, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  R. Clifton-Hadley,et al.  Introduction of bovine tuberculosis to north-east England by bought-in cattle , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[11]  A. B. Kristoffersen,et al.  Estimation of the probability of freedom from bovine virus diarrhoea virus in Norway using scenario tree modelling. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  K. Stärk,et al.  Implementing a probabilistic definition of freedom from infection to facilitate trade of livestock: putting theory into praxis for the example of bovine herpes virus-1. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  P. Ezanno,et al.  Modelling the spread of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV) in a managed metapopulation of cattle herds. , 2010, Veterinary microbiology.

[14]  P A J Martin,et al.  Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources 1: a new methodology based on scenario trees. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.