Is Your Product on the Right Side? The “Location Effect” on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation

The authors show that location of the product image on a package facade influences consumers’ perceptions of the visual heaviness of the product and evaluations of the package. The “heavier” (“lighter”) locations are on the bottom (top), right (left), and bottom-right (top-left) of the package. For products for which heaviness is considered a positive attribute, packages with the product image placed at heavy locations are preferred, whereas for products for which heaviness is considered a negative attribute, packages using light locations are preferred. Furthermore, in the former category (e.g., snacks), a salient health goal, as opposed to a neutral goal, weakens the preference for packages using heavy locations, though this moderating effect of goal is weaker for healthful snacks than for regular snacks. Store shelf context is a boundary condition, such that the location effects on perceived product heaviness and package evaluation appear in a contrasting context but disappear in an assimilating context. Moreover, perceived product heaviness mediates (1) the location effect on package evaluation and (2) the moderating role of store shelf context (i.e., mediated moderation).

[1]  G. L. Walls A theory of ocular dominance. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  H. Greenough,et al.  Form and Function: Remarks on Art, Design and Architecture , 1958 .

[3]  J. E. Russo,et al.  An Eye-Fixation Analysis of Choice Processes for Consumer Nondurables , 1994 .

[4]  E. Robert Pizzas: or Square? Psychophysical Biases in Area Comparisons , 2001 .

[5]  R B SCOTT,et al.  Eyedness as affecting results obtained with the Howard and Dolman depth perception apparatus. , 1949, The Journal of psychology.

[6]  R. Arnheim Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye, New version , 1955 .

[7]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Robert E. Krider,et al.  Pizzas: p or Square? Psychophysical Biases in Area Comparisons , 2001 .

[9]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[10]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[12]  K. N. Ogle Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[13]  S. Coren,et al.  Size accentuation in the dominant eye , 1976, Nature.

[14]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  J. Jonides Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[16]  M. Bryden,et al.  Handedness and eye-dominance: a meta-analysis of their relationship. , 1996, Laterality.

[17]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  The influence of goals on value and choice , 2000 .

[18]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Conditions for a Picture-Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory , 1984 .

[19]  H. Wölfflin Chapter Two. Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art , 2020, Baroque New Worlds.

[20]  S. Coren,et al.  The dominant eye. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  R B Mefferd,et al.  Influence of Eye Dominance on the Apparent Centers of Simple Horizontal Lines , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  A. Charpentier Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception , 1891 .

[23]  Douglas H. Wedell,et al.  Contextual Contrast in Evaluative Judgments: A Test of Pre- Versus Postintegration Models of Contrast , 1994 .

[24]  Rashmi Adaval Sometimes It Just Feels Right: The Differential Weighting of Affect-Consistent and Affect- Inconsistent Product Information , 2001 .

[25]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach? , 1999 .

[26]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentations , 1981 .

[27]  Sha Yang,et al.  Can bottles speak volumes? The effect of package shape on how much to buy , 2005 .

[28]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[29]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[30]  B. Wansink,et al.  'Bottoms Up!' The Influence of Elongation on Pouring and Consumption Volume , 2003 .

[31]  V. Folkes,et al.  The effect of package shape on consumers' judgments of product volume: Attention as a mental contaminant , 2004 .

[32]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be? , 2006 .

[33]  Zbyszko J. Schoen,et al.  A Study of the Relative Neuromuscular Efficiency of the Dominant and Non-Dominant Eye in Binocular Vision , 1935 .

[34]  M. J. Houston,et al.  Goal-Oriented Experiences and the Development of Knowledge , 1993 .

[35]  A. Krishna,et al.  The Interaction of Senses: The Effect of Vision versus Touch on the Elongation Bias , 2006 .