Evaluation of creep behavior of high density polyethylene and polyethylene-terephthalate geogrids

Abstract The tensile creep behavior of polyethylene-terephthalate (PET) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) geogrids was evaluated using five test methods: the short- and long-term stepped isothermal method (SIM), the short- and long-term time-temperature superposition (TTS), and the conventional method. SIM and TTS are acceleration tests using elevated temperatures. SIM uses a single specimen throughout all temperature steps in contrast to TTS in which a new specimen is employed for each temperature step. The test results indicate that at the same percentage of ultimate tensile strength, PET geogrid exhibited less creep deformation than the HDPE geogrid. The HDPE geogrid exhibited primary, secondary, and tertiary creep stages before rupture, whereas only primary creep and tertiary creep were detected in the PET geogrid. Furthermore, the strain rate of the primary creep stage was found to be independent of the applied loads for the PET geogrid, while it increased exponentially for the HDPE geogrid. The activation energies deduced from different accelerated creep tests were very similar for the PET geogrid. In contrast, the activation energies were higher from the short-term acceleration tests than from the long-term tests for the HDPE geogrid. The four-parameter Weibull model was able to predict the linear and non-linear creep behavior up to 100 years based on 10-h creep testing data. The creep reduction factor of 100 years design life was evaluated and higher values were resulted from the HDPE geogrid than from the PET geogrid.

[1]  C. M. Sargent,et al.  On the shape of stress-strain curves of polythylene , 1977 .

[2]  T. Peijs,et al.  Tensile strength and work of fracture of oriented polyethylene fibre , 1995 .

[3]  A. Argon,et al.  On the plastic deformation of the amorphous component in semicrystalline polymers , 1996 .

[4]  G. den Hoedt,et al.  Creep and relaxation of geotextile fabrics , 1986 .

[5]  Michael R. Kessler,et al.  Creep behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites , 2006 .

[6]  N. Dowling,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Materials , 2012 .

[7]  M. Mertens,et al.  Creep as a design tool for HMPE ropes in long term marine and offshore applications , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[8]  A. P. de Weijer,et al.  Experimental relations between physical structure and mechanical properties of a huge number of drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate) yarns , 1992 .

[9]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  A theoretical framework to analyse the behaviour of polymer geosynthetic reinforcement in temperature-accelerated creep tests , 2007 .

[10]  Robert J. Young,et al.  Deformation processes in poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers , 1998 .

[11]  Robert G. Carroll,et al.  Geogrid reinforcement in landfill closures , 1991 .

[12]  S. R. Allen,et al.  The Use of an Accelerated Test Procedure to Determine the Creep Reduction Factors of a Geosynthetic Drain , 2005 .

[13]  J. E. Sinclair,et al.  Investigation of creep phenomena in polyethylene and polypropylene , 1969 .

[14]  A. Pennings,et al.  Tensile deformation of high strength and high modulus polyethylene fibers , 1991 .

[15]  R. J. Fannin.  Long-Term Variations of Force and Strain in a Steep Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Slope , 2001 .

[16]  P. Painter,et al.  Fundamentals of Polymer Science , 2019 .

[17]  J. E. Dorn,et al.  Anelastic creep of polymethyl methacrylate , 1958 .

[18]  A. Peterlin,et al.  Molecular model of drawing polyethylene and polypropylene , 1971 .

[19]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Designing with Geosynthetics , 1986 .

[20]  W Voskamp,et al.  PREDICTING THE LONG-TERM STRENGTH OF A GEOGRID USING THE STEPPED ISOTHERMAL METHOD , 2000 .

[21]  Colin J F P Jones,et al.  The residual strength of geosynthetic reinforcement subjected to accelerated creep testing and simulated seismic events , 2007 .

[22]  J S Thornton,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT LONG TERM REDUCTION FACTORS FOR GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCING MATERIALS , 2000 .

[23]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Creep and Stress Relaxation of Geogrids , 1997 .

[24]  D. Y. Yoon,et al.  Small-angle neutron scattering by semicrystalline polyethylene , 1977 .

[25]  A. J. Pennings,et al.  The fracture process of ultra-high strength polyethylene fibres , 1984 .

[26]  G. Wilkes,et al.  Creep behaviour of high density polyethylene films having well-defined morphologies of stacked lamellae with and without an observable row-nucleated fibril structure , 1998 .

[27]  I. M. Ward,et al.  Creep and recovery of ultra high modulus polyethylene , 1981 .

[28]  Rongzhi Li,et al.  Time-temperature superposition method for glass transition temperature of plastic materials , 2000 .

[29]  R. Landel,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites , 1993 .

[30]  A. W. Thornton.  Creep of Polyethylene Above Room Temperature , 1970 .

[31]  H. M. Heuvel,et al.  Molecular changes of PET yarns during stretching measured with rheo‐optical infrared spectroscopy and other techniques , 1993 .

[32]  K. Farrag.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACCELERATED CREEP TESTING PROCEDURE FOR GEOSYNTHETICS, PART II: ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[33]  J. Ferry.  Viscoelastic properties of polymers , 1961 .

[34]  K. Farrag,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACCELERATED CREEP TESTING PROCEDURE FOR GEOSYNTHETICS-PART I: TESTING , 1997 .

[35]  Allen Lunzhu Li,et al.  Effects of viscous behavior of geosynthetic reinforcement and foundation soils on the performance of reinforced embankments , 2008 .

[36]  A. McGown,et al.  Strain Behaviour of Polymeric Geogrids Subjected to Sustained and Repeated Loading in Air and in Soil , 1995 .