Using machine learning algorithms to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients

BackgroundTargeting older clients for rehabilitation is a clinical challenge and a research priority. We investigate the potential of machine learning algorithms – Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) – to guide rehabilitation planning for home care clients.MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of data on 24,724 longer-term clients from eight home care programs in Ontario. Data were collected with the RAI-HC assessment system, in which the Activities of Daily Living Clinical Assessment Protocol (ADLCAP) is used to identify clients with rehabilitation potential. For study purposes, a client is defined as having rehabilitation potential if there was: i) improvement in ADL functioning, or ii) discharge home. SVM and KNN results are compared with those obtained using the ADLCAP. For comparison, the machine learning algorithms use the same functional and health status indicators as the ADLCAP.ResultsThe KNN and SVM algorithms achieved similar substantially improved performance over the ADLCAP, although false positive and false negative rates were still fairly high (FP > .18, FN > .34 versus FP > .29, FN. > .58 for ADLCAP). Results are used to suggest potential revisions to the ADLCAP.ConclusionMachine learning algorithms achieved superior predictions than the current protocol. Machine learning results are less readily interpretable, but can also be used to guide development of improved clinical protocols.

[1]  R. Kuisma,et al.  A randomized, controlled comparison of home versus institutional rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Frank Knoefel,et al.  State of the art in geriatric rehabilitation. Part I: review of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  A. Giusti,et al.  An analysis of the feasibility of home rehabilitation among elderly people with proximal femoral fractures. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Naoki Ikegami,et al.  Home care quality indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. , 2004, The Gerontologist.

[5]  Sing-Fai Tam,et al.  Predicting osteoarthritic knee rehabilitation outcome by using a prediction model developed by data mining techniques , 2004, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  L. Rapport,et al.  Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  S. Gunn,et al.  Machine Learning Can Improve Prediction of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Using Admission Values of APACHE II Score and C-Reactive Protein , 2006, Pancreatology.

[8]  E. Coleman Falling Through the Cracks: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Transitional Care for Persons with Continuous Complex Care Needs , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  On prediction of vocational rehabilitation outcome at a Swedish employability institute. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  B E Fries,et al.  Scaling ADLs within the MDS. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[12]  N. Ikegami,et al.  Comprehensive Clinical Assessment in Community Setting: Applicability of the MDS‐HC , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  J. Morris,et al.  Measuring change in activities of daily living in nursing home residents with moderate to severe cognitive impairment , 2006, BMC geriatrics.

[14]  Peter J.F. Lucas Bayesian analysis, pattern analysis, and data mining in health care , 2004, Current opinion in critical care.

[15]  Mu Zhu,et al.  The K-nearest neighbor algorithm predicted rehabilitation potential better than current Clinical Assessment Protocol. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  Kenneth J Ottenbacher,et al.  Comparison of logistic regression and neural network analysis applied to predicting living setting after hip fracture. , 2004, Annals of epidemiology.

[17]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Effect of an In‐Home Occupational and Physical Therapy Intervention on Reducing Mortality in Functionally Vulnerable Older People: Preliminary Findings , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  R. L. Kennedy,et al.  Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  B E Fries,et al.  Integrated Health Information Systems Based on the RAI/MDS Series of Instruments , 1999, Healthcare management forum.

[20]  Maria Crotty,et al.  Patient and caregiver outcomes 12 months after home-based therapy for hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  H. Grüneberg An Analysis of the , 1938 .