Three‐Layer Appearance of the Arterial Wall in Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging:

A three‐layer appearance of the arterial wall in intravascular ultrasound imaging has been described, but its correspondence with a characteristic histologic structure is still controversial. Some studies emphasize the imprecision of vessel‐wall measurements carried out on the intravascular ultrasound image, while other studies cast doubt upon the reality of the three‐layer appearance and its correspondence with a characteristic histologic structure. The consequences of this disputed point are important with respect to the interpretation of such images. We performed an in vitro study using phantoms and heighty postnecroptic arteries to determine the relations existing between histology, acoustic properties of arterial wall tissue, and intravascular ultrasound image formation. Measurements carried out on phantoms showed a significant overestimation of wall thickness, equal to axial resolution and due to the radial impulse response of the imaging system. Measurements performed on normal arterial walls of muscular arteries with a three‐layer appearance or normal arterial walls of elastic arteries with a single‐layer appearance showed very clearly that there was no correlation with histologic measurements of the thickness of intima and media taken individually. However, measurements (n = 53), which include the intima plus the media, exhibit excellent correlation with histologic measurements: r = 0.95 ± 0.03, y = 1.02 + 11.2. The shiny internal ring of the muscular artery wall on the image corresponded always to the internal elastic lamina (IEL). Thus, the three‐layer appearance is not an artifact. However, specific alterations, which this appearance may undergo during image formation such as beam incidence angle, lateral and radial impulse responses, and the effects of proximity of the transducer to the arterial wall, modified the shape and sizes characterizing the IEL on intravascular ultrasound images. The description and understanding of such image alterations are necessary for both interpreting them and determining which are the only reliable measurements that can be performed.

[1]  J W Miller,et al.  The Dependence of Ultrasonic Attenuation and Backscatter on Collagen Content in Dog and Rabbit Hearts , 1980, Circulation research.

[2]  C T Lancée,et al.  Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  F J Pinto,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Coronary Arteries: Is Three Layers the Norm? , 1992, Circulation.

[4]  J. Isner,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction of Human Coronary and Peripheral Arteries From Images Recorded During Two‐Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Examination , 1991, Circulation.

[5]  R. Popp,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound evaluation of intimal thickening in cardiac transplant recipients: Correlation with clinical characteristics , 1991 .

[6]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Limitations of postmortem assessment of human coronary artery size and luminal narrowing: differential effects of tissue fixation and processing on vessels with different degrees of atherosclerosis. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M Amiel,et al.  Artifacts in intravascular ultrasound imaging: analyses and implications. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  F J Pinto,et al.  Intracoronary Ultrasound in Cardiac Transplant Recipients: In Vivo Evidence of “Angiographically Silent” Intimal Thickening , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Methodology for three-dimensional reconstruction of intravascular ultrasound images , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[10]  S. M. Collins,et al.  Ultrasonic backscatter and collagen in normal ventricular myocardium. , 1984, Circulation.

[11]  J W Hunt,et al.  Measurement of the ultrasonic properties of vascular tissues and blood from 35-65 MHz. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  A J Tajik,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  P Pignoli,et al.  Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. , 1986, Circulation.

[14]  R. Helfant,et al.  Potential limitations of ultrasound imaging , 1990 .

[15]  M Halliwell,et al.  Ultimate limits in ultrasonic imaging resolution. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  D. Nicholas,et al.  EVALUATION OF BACKSCATTERING COEFFICIENTS FOR EXCISED HUMAN TISSUES: RESULTS, INTERPRETATION AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS , 1982 .

[17]  P. Yock,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound. Looking below the surface of vascular disease. , 1990, Circulation.

[18]  N Bom,et al.  Angle-dependent backscatter from the arterial wall. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  B. Wranne,et al.  Hepatic venous flow assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  P. Yock,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound: significance of the three-layered appearance of normal muscular arteries , 1990 .

[21]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Detection of myocardial infarction in vitro based on altered attenuation of ultrasound. , 1977, Circulation research.

[22]  W. Roberts,et al.  Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. , 1990, Circulation.

[23]  T. Gerber,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Arterial Wall Architecture , 1992, Echocardiography.