Feeding by Scolytus bark beetles to test for differently susceptible elm varieties

Dutch elm disease (DED), caused by the fungi Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo‐ulmi, has reduced elm populations severely in Europe and North America. Breeding programmes are in action to find less susceptible elm varieties suitable for re‐establishing elm stands. Bark beetles, mainly Scolytus spp., are the only known natural vectors of DED. During twig feeding, beetles transfer Ophiostoma spores to healthy elms. Thus, less palatable elms should run a lower risk of DED infections. In feeding preference bioassays, we offered twigs from elms exhibiting different degree of susceptibility to O. novo‐ulmi, together with non‐host trees to Scolytus beetles. Scolytus multistriatus preferred wych elm, Ulmus glabra, to 100% in two‐choice tests, whereas S. laevis did not discriminate between a tolerant and a susceptible variety of field elm, U. minor. We suggest that the feeding assay is useful as a low‐tech method in breeding programmes for evaluating the suitability of promising elm genotypes to vector insects.

[1]  M. Faccoli,et al.  Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association , 2015 .

[2]  D. Werf,et al.  Comparison of commercial elm cultivars and promising unreleased Dutch clones for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi , 2015 .

[3]  J. Domínguez,et al.  Seven Ulmus minor clones tolerant to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi registered as forest reproductive material in Spain , 2015 .

[4]  A. Buhroo.  Host selection behavior and incidence of the bark beetle Scolytus kashmirensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) attacking elm (Ulmus spp.) trees in Kashmir , 2012 .

[5]  A. Santini,et al.  ‘Morfeo’ Elm: a new variety resistant to Dutch elm disease , 2012 .

[6]  Luis Gil,et al.  Metabolic fingerprinting allows discrimination between Ulmus pumila and U. minor, and between U. minor clones of different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease , 2008 .

[7]  A. Santini,et al.  Screening European Elms for Resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi , 2005 .

[8]  J. Pajares,et al.  Triterpenes in elms in Spain , 2005 .

[9]  J. Pajares,et al.  Feeding responses by Scolytus scolytus to twig bark extracts from elms , 2004 .

[10]  J. Webber.  Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease , 2004 .

[11]  J. Pajares.  Elm breeding for resistance against bark beetles , 2004 .

[12]  K. Klepzig,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of plant-derived antifeedants against the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). , 1999 .

[13]  F. Schlyter,et al.  Ecology of the dutch elm disease vectors Scolytus laevis and S. scolytus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in southern Sweden , 1987 .

[14]  F. Schlyter,et al.  Differences in morphology and sexual size dimorphism between the Dutch elm disease vectors Scolytus laevis and Scolytus scolytus (Col., Scolytidae) , 1987 .

[15]  J. Webber,et al.  Host feeding preference of Scolytus scolytus. , 1983 .

[16]  Paul Spessivtseff.  Bestämningstabell över svenska barkborrar , 1922 .