Capture-recapture models including covariate effects.

Capture-recapture methods are used to estimate the incidence of a disease, using a multiple-source registry. Usually, log-linear methods are used to estimate population size, assuming that not all sources of notification are dependent. Where there are categorical covariates, a stratified analysis can be performed. The multinomial logit model has occasionally been used. In this paper, the authors compare log-linear and logit models with and without covariates, and use simulated data to compare estimates from different models. The crude estimate of population size is biased when the sources are not independent. Analyses adjusting for covariates produce less biased estimates. In the absence of covariates, or where all covariates are categorical, the log-linear model and the logit model are equivalent. The log-linear model cannot include continuous variables. To minimize potential bias in estimating incidence, covariates should be included in the design and analysis of multiple-source disease registries.

[1]  R. Benn,et al.  Estimation of completeness of cancer registration. , 1982, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  J. Alho Logistic regression in capture-recapture models. , 1990, Biometrics.

[3]  I Heuch,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the proportion of congenital malformations using double registration systems. , 1994, Biometrics.

[4]  S E Fienberg,et al.  A three-sample multiple-recapture approach to census population estimation with heterogeneous catchability. , 1993, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[5]  M. W. Birch Maximum Likelihood in Three-Way Contingency Tables , 1963 .

[6]  A. Agresti Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort. , 1994, Biometrics.

[7]  H Straatman,et al.  The capture-recapture method for estimation of cancer registry completeness: a useful tool? , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  C. Taylor,et al.  Estimated numbers of homeless and homeless mentally ill people in north east Westminster by using capture-recapture analysis , 1994, BMJ.

[9]  Ronald E. LaPorte,et al.  Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: History and theoretical development ( Review ) , 1995 .

[10]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[11]  R. Regal,et al.  Effect of variation in probability of ascertainment by sources ("variable catchability") upon "capture-recapture" estimates of prevalence. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  S. Baker The Multinomial‐Poisson Transformation , 1994 .

[13]  R R Regal,et al.  Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. , 1995, Epidemiologic reviews.

[14]  R. Huggins On the statistical analysis of capture experiments , 1989 .

[15]  J. Alho,et al.  Estimating heterogeneity in the probabilities of enumeration for dual-system estimation. , 1993, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[16]  L D Marrett,et al.  An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Lalitha Sanathanan,et al.  ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF A MULTINOMIAL POPULATION , 1972 .

[18]  H Brenner,et al.  USE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE CAPTURE‐RECAPTURE METHOD IN DISEASE MONITORING WITH TWO DEPENDENT SOURCES , 1995, Epidemiology.