MR imaging-guided biopsy and therapeutic intervention in a closed-configuration magnet: single-center series of 361 punctures.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to evaluate practical experience with interventional MR imaging in a closed-bore 1.5-T imaging system. A total of 361 MR-guided biopsies were performed in 250 patients and analyzed retrospectively. The technique comprised four steps: localization; planning; action (cutting or aspiration biopsy, or instillation of a therapeutic agent), with verification in two perpendicular planes; and obtaining control scans. CONCLUSION The mean duration of a biopsy was 21 min; there were no major complications. Image contrast, signal, matrix options, and visibility of needle track and tip position permitted uncomplicated orientation. The interventional MR technique could be applied in any puncture setting.

[1]  S. Seltzer,et al.  Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: cost-identification analysis. , 1998, Radiology.

[2]  R Lufkin,et al.  A technique for MR-guided needle placement. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Michael Friebe,et al.  Future of advanced guidance techniques by interventional CT and MRI , 1995 .

[4]  R. Lufkin,et al.  Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J M Pauly,et al.  Management of biopsy needle artifacts: Techniques for RF‐refocused MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  J. Gieseke,et al.  Lokalisierbarkeit von Punktionsnadeln in der MRT: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Präzision mittels Spin-Echo-Pulsfolgen bei 1,0 T , 1997 .

[7]  G. Adam,et al.  Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen , 1999, European Radiology.

[8]  A. Darzi,et al.  The interventional magnetic resonance unit--the minimal access operating theatre of the future? , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  F. Jolesz,et al.  Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  E. Dumont,et al.  Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  R R Edelman,et al.  MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. , 1986, Radiology.