Evaluation of a silica-containing bone graft substitute in a vertebral defect model.

Orthopedic and spine surgeons are in need of supplements or replacements for autograft. We investigated the histological properties of three formulations of Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate [calcium sodium phosphosilicate putty with or without autograft and NovaBone 45S5 Bioglass particulate (NovaBone, LLC, Jacksonville, FL)] using a sheep vertebral bone void model. Bone voids were surgically created in L3, L4, and L5 in each of 22 sheep, and the voids were filled with one of the tested biomaterials or left empty as a control. Histological evaluations were performed at either: 0, 6, or 12 weeks after surgery. Undecalcified sections were digitized, and the areas of the original defect and new bone were quantified. Decalcified sections were evaluated qualitatively. Histomorphometry showed a significant increase in the amount of bone between 6 and 12 weeks in all groups, but there was no significant difference in new bone formation among the formulations or between any formulation and the empty defects. The granules of all three formulations were associated with an inflammatory reaction. Many of the particles appear to have a hollow center, and the narrow tunnel through the center of the particles was sometimes associated with acute inflammation especially at 6 weeks. These particles were also associated with chronic inflammation at both 6 and 12 weeks, although the extent of inflammation decreased between 6 and 12 weeks. The search for the optimum bone graft substitute/extender will continue.

[1]  T. Bauer,et al.  Long-term evaluation of a calcium phosphate bone cement with carboxymethyl cellulose in a vertebral defect model. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[2]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[3]  J. Ascherman,et al.  Cranial Defect Reconstruction in an Experimental Model Using Different Mixtures of Bioglass and Autologous Bone , 2007, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  T. Bauer,et al.  Bone graft substitutes , 2007, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  T. Bauer,et al.  Histological evaluation of an impacted bone graft substitute composed of a combination of mineralized and demineralized allograft in a sheep vertebral bone defect. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  T. Buckland,et al.  Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  H. Precheur Bone graft materials. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[8]  A. Sculean,et al.  Four-year results of a prospective-controlled clinical study evaluating healing of intra-bony defects following treatment with an enamel matrix protein derivative alone or combined with a bioactive glass. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  A. Turner,et al.  Efficacy of silicated calcium phosphate graft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  Thomas W Bauer,et al.  An overview of the histology of skeletal substitute materials. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  M. Hardenbrook,et al.  Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate as a bone void filler after kyphoplasty in a young patient with multiple compression fractures due to osteogenesis imperfecta variant: case report. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[12]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  D. Togawa,et al.  Histological and radiographic evaluation of polymethylmethacrylate with two different concentrations of barium sulfate in a sheep vertebroplasty model. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Lymphocytes and the foreign body response: lymphocyte enhancement of macrophage adhesion and fusion. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  I. Jackson,et al.  Evaluation of 45S5 Bioactive Glass Combined as a Bone Substitute in the Reconstruction of Critical Size Calvarial Defects in Rabbits , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  A. Gosain Bioactive glass for bone replacement in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  D. Holck,et al.  Use of Bioglass for Orbital Volume Augmentation in Enophthalmos: A Rabbit Model (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) , 2003, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  Z. Šmahel,et al.  Bioactive Glass-Ceramics in Facial Skeleton Contouring , 2002, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[19]  K Aitasalo,et al.  Repair of orbital floor fractures with bioactive glass implants. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[20]  M Vogel,et al.  In vivo comparison of bioactive glass particles in rabbits. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[21]  I. Silver,et al.  Interactions of bioactive glasses with osteoblasts in vitro: effects of 45S5 Bioglass, and 58S and 77S bioactive glasses on metabolism, intracellular ion concentrations and cell viability. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[22]  G. Muschler,et al.  Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  D. Chamberland,et al.  Effect of bioactive glass particle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Particulate Bioglass Compared With Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  S. Low,et al.  Bioactive ceramics for periodontal treatment: comparative studies in the Patus monkey. , 1992, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[26]  J M Anderson,et al.  Inflammatory response to implants. , 1988, ASAIO transactions.

[27]  X Zhang,et al.  Bone induction by porous glass ceramic made from Bioglass (45S5). , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.