Bayesian Structural Equation Models for Cumulative Theory Building in Information Systems - A Brief Tutorial Using BUGS and R

Theories are sets of causal relationships between constructs and their proxy indicator variables. Theories are tested and their numerical parameters are estimated using statistical models of latent and observed variables. A considerable amount of theoretical development in Information Systems occurs by theory extension or adaptation. Moreover, researchers are encouraged to reuse existing measurement instruments when possible. As a consequence, there are many cases when a relationship between two variables (latent and/or observed) is re-estimated in a new study with a new sample or in a new context. To aid in cumulative theory building, a re-estimation of parameters should take into account our prior knowledge about their likely values. In this paper, we show how Bayesian statistical models can provide a statistically sound way of incorporating prior knowledge into parameter estimation, allowing researchers to keep a “running tally” of the best estimates of model parameters.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[3]  D. Whetten What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[4]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[5]  P. Palange,et al.  From the authors , 2007, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Fast Form Approach to Measuring Technology Acceptance and Other Constructs , 2008, MIS Q..

[7]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient , 1983, Oper. Res..

[8]  Adrian Raftery,et al.  The Number of Iterations, Convergence Diagnostics and Generic Metropolis Algorithms , 1995 .

[9]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[11]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[12]  Tihomir Asparouhov,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Latent Variable Models using Mplus , 2010 .

[13]  Sik-Yum Lee,et al.  A Bayesian Approach for Analyzing Hierarchical Data With Missing Outcomes Through Structural Equation Models , 2008 .

[14]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian Analysis Using Mplus: Technical Implementation , 2010 .

[15]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[16]  W. Holmes Finch,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures for the Determination of Measurement Invariance , 2006 .

[17]  Snigdhansu Chatterjee,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling, A Bayesian Approach , 2008, Technometrics.

[18]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[19]  Model Selection in Structural Equation Models With Continuous and Polytomous Data , 2001 .

[20]  L. Hayduk,et al.  Testing! testing! one, two, three - Testing the theory in structural equation models! , 2007 .

[21]  B. Byrne Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled , 2004 .

[22]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  The Time Has Come : Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis in the Organizational Sciences , 2012 .

[23]  William J. Browne,et al.  Bayesian and likelihood-based methods in multilevel modeling 1 A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models , 2006 .

[24]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[25]  William R. King,et al.  Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  M. Zyphur,et al.  Bayesian Estimation and Inference , 2015 .

[27]  D. Dey,et al.  To Bayes or Not to Bayes, From Whether to When: Applications of Bayesian Methodology to Modeling , 2004 .

[28]  Xin-Yuan Song,et al.  A Bayesian Approach for Nonlinear Structural Equation Models With Dichotomous Variables Using Logit and Probit Links , 2010 .

[29]  Dale N. Glaser,et al.  Jiving the Four-Step, Waltzing Around Factor Analysis, and Other Serious Fun , 2000 .

[30]  R. Scheines,et al.  Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models , 1999 .

[31]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  [Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo]: Comment: One Long Run with Diagnostics: Implementation Strategies for Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 1992 .

[32]  J. Q. Smith,et al.  1. Bayesian Statistics 4 , 1993 .

[33]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian mediation analysis. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[34]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[35]  Soon Ang,et al.  Turnover of Information Technology Professionals: A Narrative Review, Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling, and Model Development , 2007, MIS Q..

[36]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[37]  David J. Lunn,et al.  The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis , 2013 .

[38]  Mary Tate,et al.  Fitting Covariance Models for Theory Generation , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[40]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[41]  Xin-Yuan Song and Sik-Yum Lee. Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[42]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[43]  Nian-Sheng Tang,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Analyzing Structural Equation Models With Covariates, Interaction, and Quadratic Latent Variables , 2007 .

[44]  Varun Grover,et al.  Investigating Two Contradictory Views of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2010, MIS Q..

[45]  Zhiqiang Zheng,et al.  Toward a Causal Interpretation from Observational Data: A New Bayesian Networks Method for Structural Models with Latent Variables , 2006 .