Prospective ergonomics: origin, goal, and prospects.

So far ergonomics has been concerned with two categories of activities: correction and design. We propose to add a third category: prospection, and by so doing, we introduce a new series of activities that opens up the future of ergonomics. Corrective ergonomics relates to the past and comes with a demand and a client. It is turned towards the correction of existing situations and aims to reduce or eliminate problems. Here, after delimiting and defining the problem, the challenge is to find the best solution. Ergonomics for design relates to the present and also comes with a demand and a client. It is turned towards the design of new artefacts that have already been identified by a client, and that will allow users to do some activity and attain their goals. Here, after defining the scope of the project and the functional requirements, the challenge is to do the best design. Finally, prospective ergonomics relates to the future and does not come with a demand and a client. It is turned towards the creation of future things that have not been identified yet. Here the challenge is to detect existing user needs or anticipate future ones, and imagine solutions. These three categories of activities overlap and are not exclusive of each other. In this paper we define prospective ergonomics and compare it with corrective ergonomics and ergonomics for design. We describe its origin, goal, and prospects, we analyze its impacts on education and practice, and we emphasize the need of new collaboration between ergonomics and other disciplines.

[1]  John Dixon,et al.  The Design of Future Things , 2010 .

[2]  John Ratcliffe,et al.  Challenges for corporate foresight: towards strategic prospective through scenario thinking , 2006 .

[3]  Daniel Spooner,et al.  Anticipating needs and designing new items rapidly - a case study for the design of postural aid equipment. , 2012, Work.

[4]  Michel Godet Effective strategic management the prospective approach , 1989 .

[5]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Technology futures analysis: Toward integration of the field and new methods , 2004 .

[6]  Joseph Voros,et al.  Introducing a classification framework for prospective methods , 2006 .

[7]  Jérôme Dinet,et al.  La méthode des staffs d'experts de communautés Orientation théorique, démarche méthodologique et application pratique , 2009, Document Numérique.

[8]  J. Nelson Contribution à l'analyse prospective des usages dans les projets d'innovation , 2011 .

[9]  Gerrit C. van der Veer,et al.  Cognitive Ergonomics in Interface Design - Discussion of a Moving Science , 2008, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Fabrice Roubelat Scenarios to challenge strategic paradigms: Lessons from 2025 , 2006 .

[11]  Theodore J. Gordon,et al.  Paper 7 : Integration, Comparisons, and Frontier of Futures Research Methods , 2004 .

[12]  Jean-Marc Robert,et al.  What Is Prospective Ergonomics? A Reflection and a Position on the Future of Ergonomics , 2009, HCI.

[13]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[14]  Bettina Von Stamm,et al.  Managing Innovation, Design and Creativity , 2003 .

[15]  M. Godet,et al.  Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios , 1996 .

[16]  Maurice de Montmollin Les systèmes hommes-machines : introduction à l'ergonomie , 1967 .

[17]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[18]  Xavier Franch,et al.  Towards anticipating requirements changes through studies of the future , 2011, 2011 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE.

[19]  Heiner Bubb Ergonomic Design by Means of Human Models , 2000 .

[20]  Eric Brangier,et al.  Persona: A Method to Produce Representations Focused on Consumers’ Needs , 2011 .