The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index – Measuring regional entrepreneurship

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From a Managed to an Entrepreneurial Economy The shift from a ‘managed’ economy to an ‘entrepreneurial’ economy is among the most important challenges developed economies have faced over the last few decades. This challenge is closely coupled with the increasing importance of non-physical capital, such as human and intellectual capital for wealth creation. The most notable signs of this shift are the following: 1. knowledge is increasingly replacing physical capital and labor as the key driving force of economic growth; 2. individuals rather than large firms are the leading factor in new knowledge creation; 3. alongside with large conglomerates, new and small firms play a dominant role in translating newly created knowledge into marketable goods and services; 4. traditional industrial policy, with antitrust laws and small business protection, has been replaced by a much broader entrepreneurship policy aiming to promote entrepreneurial innovation and facilitate high-growth potential start-ups. Entrepreneurship Policy Three distinct foci can be identified in EU entrepreneurship policy, as it has evolved over time: 1. focus on SMEs; 2. focus on innovation through SMEs; 3. focus on high-growth SMEs. These co-existing foci reflect evolution in the understanding of the varied roles that entrepreneurship can play in economic development. However, although each of these focus areas adds important elements to the European economic policy toolbox, none of them alone provides a definitive answers to the diverse and varied challenges that different European regions face, as they seek to implement policies to enhance regional dynamism and competitiveness. The most recent evolution in entrepreneurship policy – an increasing emphasis on taking a more holistic and multi-pronged view of entrepreneurship, as advocated by the ‘entrepreneurship support ecosystem’ thinking – represents yet another evolution in European policy thinking. The focus on ‘entrepreneurship ecosystems’ calls attention to entrepreneurship support policies and initiatives over the entire lifecycle of the new venture, the key insight being that entrepreneurship support should be considered in a wider regional context. Thus, this emphasis naturally shifts focus towards a regional level of analysis, consistent with the focus of this current report and its ‘Systems of Entrepreneurship’ approach. Yet, although similar on the surface, the two concepts are fundamentally different. Whereas the notion of ‘Entrepreneurship Ecosystems’ focuses on entrepreneurship support policies and initiatives from a policy perspective, the notion of ‘Systems of Entrepreneurship’ draws attention to the entrepreneurial dynamic that ultimately drives productivity growth in regions. The two approaches therefore complement one 2 another, and the REDI index should provide important guidance for the design of entrepreneurship support ecosystems.

[1]  P. McCann,et al.  Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy , 2015 .

[2]  Nicholas Charron,et al.  Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States , 2014 .

[3]  Niels Bosma,et al.  The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Research , 2013 .

[4]  R. Sternberg Regional Determinants of Entrepreneurial Activities – Theories and Empirical Evidence , 2011 .

[5]  Jun Koo,et al.  New Firm Formation and Industry Clusters: A Case of the Drugs Industry in the U.S , 2011 .

[6]  A. Sørensen,et al.  Returns to Schooling in Self-Employment , 2010 .

[7]  László Szerb,et al.  The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEINDEX) , 2010 .

[8]  Scott Stern,et al.  Clusters and Entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[9]  Tomasz Mickiewicz,et al.  Better Means More: Property Rights and High-Growth Aspiration Entrepreneurship , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The embedded entrepreneur , 2009 .

[11]  S. Anokhin,et al.  Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption , 2009 .

[12]  Erik Stam,et al.  The roles of R&D in new firm growth , 2009 .

[13]  P. Thompson,et al.  The Spatial Dispersion of Informal Investment at a Regional Level: Evidence from the UK , 2009 .

[14]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates--evidence from Sweden , 2009 .

[15]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth , 2008 .

[16]  Mirjam van Praag,et al.  Education and Entrepreneurship Selection and Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2008 .

[17]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Local Industrial Conditions and Entrepreneurship: How Much of the Spatial Distribution Can We Explain? , 2008 .

[18]  Dani Rodrik,et al.  Second-Best Institutions , 2008 .

[19]  S. Desai,et al.  A Theory of Destructive Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[20]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time – assessing the potential of policy promotion programs , 2007 .

[21]  R. Thurik,et al.  Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting , 2007 .

[22]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions , 2005 .

[23]  Richard Florida,et al.  Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis of New Firm Formation , 2004 .

[24]  S. Parker The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship: Characteristics of entrepreneurs and the environment for entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[25]  E. Glaeser,et al.  The Rise of the Skilled City , 2003 .

[26]  R. Harrison,et al.  Closing the Regional Equity Gap? A Critique of the Department of Trade and Industry's Regional Venture Capital Funds Initiative , 2003 .

[27]  Simon Johnson,et al.  Unbundling Institutions , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999 , 2003 .

[29]  V. Kanniainen,et al.  Start-Up Investment with Scarce Venture Capital Support , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  A. Kangasharju Regional variations in firm formation: Panel and cross-section data evidence from Finland , 2000 .

[31]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[32]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[33]  R. Boschma,et al.  Evolutionary economics and economic geography , 1999 .

[34]  B. Lundvall National Business Systems and National Systems of Innovation , 1999 .

[35]  Sarah Williams,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Society , 1998 .

[36]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle , 1998 .

[37]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[38]  R. Yager Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[39]  Paul A. Gompers Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital , 1995 .

[40]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance , 1994 .

[41]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  Autonomous Firm Dynamics and Economic Growth in the United States, 1986–1990 , 1994 .

[42]  G. Garofoli New Firm Formation and Regional Development: The Italian Case , 1994 .

[43]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Researching Entrepreneurship , 1992 .

[44]  Alwyn Young A Tale of Two Cities: Factor Accumulation and Technical Change in Hong Kong and Singapore , 1992, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[45]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[46]  G. Harrison,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Weakest Link/Best Shot Models of Public Goods , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  F. Gardner How the West grew rich: the economic transformation of the industrial world , 1986 .

[48]  Arto Ojala,et al.  Market entry and priority of small and medium-sized enterprises in the software industry: An empirical analysis of cultural distance, geographical distance, and market size , 2011 .

[49]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Sites and Modes of Knowledge Creation: On the Spatial Organization of Biotechnology Innovation , 2007 .

[50]  C. Schramm Economic Fluidity: A Crucial Dimension of Economic Freedom , 2007 .

[51]  Bruce Caldwell,et al.  Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach , 2007 .

[52]  Hans Westlund Social capital in the knowledge economy , 2006 .

[53]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[54]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  Culture's Role in Entrepreneurship; Self-employment out of Dissatisfaction , 2004 .

[55]  L. Pil The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[56]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[57]  Z. Ács,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy , 1999 .

[58]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[59]  F. Riggins A Framework for Developing E-Business Metrics Through Functionality Interaction , 1990 .

[60]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[61]  C. Papahristodoulou Inventions, innovations, and economic growth in Sweden: An appraisal of the Schumpeterian theory , 1987 .

[62]  Roy Thurik,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management What's New about the New Economy? Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .