Probabilistic Feature Relevance Learning for Content-Based Image Retrieval

Most of the current image retrieval systems use “one-shot” queries to a database to retrieve similar images. Typically a K-nearest neighbor kind of algorithm is used, where weights measuring feature importance along each input dimension remain fixed (or manually tweaked by the user), in the computation of a given similarity metric. However, the similarity does not vary with equal strength or in the same proportion in all directions in the feature space emanating from the query image. The manual adjustment of these weights is time consuming and exhausting. Moreover, it requires a very sophisticated user. In this paper, we present a novel probabilistic method that enables image retrieval procedures to automatically capture feature relevance based on user's feedback and that is highly adaptive to query locations. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate the efficacy of our technique using both simulated and real-world data.

[1]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  David L. Waltz,et al.  Trading MIPS and memory for knowledge engineering , 1992, CACM.

[3]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Discriminant Adaptive Nearest Neighbor Classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Jerome H. Friedman,et al.  Flexible Metric Nearest Neighbor Classification , 1994 .

[6]  Bing Leng,et al.  An Engineering Approach for Troubleshooting Case Bases , 1997, ICCBR.

[7]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in MARS , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[8]  N. Graube AI Review , 2001 .

[9]  Tom Minka,et al.  Interactive learning with a "society of models" , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .

[11]  Tom Minka,et al.  Interactive learning with a "Society of Models" , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Dragutin Petkovic,et al.  Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System , 1995, Computer.

[13]  HastieTrevor,et al.  Discriminant Adaptive Nearest Neighbor Classification , 1996 .

[14]  Jing Peng,et al.  Efficient Memory-Based Dynamic Programming , 1995, ICML.

[15]  Thomas G. Dietterich What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[16]  Catherine Blake,et al.  UCI Repository of machine learning databases , 1998 .

[17]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[18]  Bir Bhanu,et al.  Gabor wavelet representation for 3-D object recognition , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Similarity measures for image databases , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems..

[20]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.