Differential Fermentation of Cellulose Allomorphs by Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria

In addition to its usual native crystalline form (cellulose I), cellulose can exist in a variety of alternative crystalline forms (allomorphs) which differ in their unit cell dimensions, chain packing schemes, and hydrogen bonding relationships. We prepared, by various chemical treatments, four different alternative allomorphs, along with an amorphous (noncrystalline) cellulose which retained its original molecular weight. We then examined the kinetics of degradation of these materials by two species of ruminal bacteria and by inocula from two bovine rumens. Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 and Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 were similar to one another in their relative rates of digestion of the different celluloses, which proceeded in the following order: amorphous > IIII > IVI > IIIII > I > II. Unlike F. succinogenes, R. flavefaciens did not degrade cellulose II, even after an incubation of 3 weeks. Comparisons of the structural features of these allomorphs with their digestion kinetics suggest that degradation is enhanced by skewing of adjacent sheets in the microfibril, but is inhibited by intersheet hydrogen bonding and by antiparallelism in adjacent sheets. Mixed microflora from the bovine rumens showed in vitro digestion rates quite different from one another and from those of both of the two pure bacterial cultures, suggesting that R. flavefaciens and F. succinogenes (purportedly among the most active of the cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen) either behave differently in the ruminal ecosystem from the way they do in pure culture or did not play a major role in cellulose digestion in these ruminal samples.

[1]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  The Rumen and Its Microbes , 2013 .

[2]  J. Sugiyama,et al.  Electron diffraction study on the two crystalline phases occurring in native cellulose from an algal cell wall , 1991 .

[3]  P. Weimer,et al.  Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  J. Sugiyama,et al.  Transformation of Valonia cellulose crystals by an alkaline hydrothermal treatment , 1990 .

[5]  D. Stahl,et al.  Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and Description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov. , 1988 .

[6]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Possible adsorption sites of cellulases on crystalline cellulose , 1988 .

[7]  Hyo-Seon Ryu,et al.  Properties of cotton fibers containing the cellulose IV crystal structure , 1987 .

[8]  J. Costerton,et al.  Electron microscopic study of the methylcellulose-mediated detachment of cellulolytic rumen bacteria from cellulose fibers. , 1987, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[9]  A. Sarko,et al.  Mercerization of cellulose. III. Changes in crystallite sizes , 1987 .

[10]  A. Sarko,et al.  Mercerization of cellulose. IV. Mechanism of mercerization and crystallite sizes , 1987 .

[11]  R. R. Benerito,et al.  Conversion of Cellulose I to Stable Cellulose III , 1986 .

[12]  P. Weimer,et al.  Relationship between the fine structure of native cellulose and cellulose degradability by the cellulase complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Colloidal gold labelling of l,4‐β‐D‐glucan cellobiohydrolase adsorbed on cellulose substrates , 1984 .

[14]  R. Atalla,et al.  Native Cellulose: A Composite of Two Distinct Crystalline Forms , 1984, Science.

[15]  P. Beltrame,et al.  Effects of structural features of cotton cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis , 1981 .

[16]  D. Groleau,et al.  Cellulolytic activity of the rumen bacterium Bacteroides succinogenes. , 1981, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[17]  A. Sarko,et al.  Packing Analysis of Carbohydrates and Polysaccharides. 11. Molecular and Crystal Structure of Native Ramie Cellulose , 1980 .

[18]  R. Atalla Conformation effects in the hydrolysis of cellulose , 1978 .

[19]  A. French The crystal structure of native ramie cellulose , 1978 .

[20]  Mertens Dr Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion. , 1977 .

[21]  A. Stipanovic,et al.  Packing Analysis of Carbohydrates and Polysaccharides. 6. Molecular and Crystal Structure of Regenerated Cellulose II , 1976 .

[22]  A. Sarko,et al.  Packing Analysis of Carbohydrates and Polysaccharides. 7. Crystal Structure of Cellulose IIII and Its Relationship to Other Cellulose Polymorphs , 1976 .

[23]  K. W. King,et al.  Significance of the crystal structure of cellulose in the production and action of cellulase. , 1968, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[24]  B. A. Dehority,et al.  Vitamin Requirements of Several Cellulolytic Rumen Bacteria , 1965, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  L. Segal',et al.  An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer , 1959 .

[26]  H. L. E. Vix,et al.  Improved Process for Cotton Decrystallization , 1957 .

[27]  R. Marchessault,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of the Lateral-Order Distribution in Cellulose , 1957 .

[28]  L. Segal',et al.  An X‐ray study of the decomposition product of the ethylamine‐cellulose complex , 1954 .

[29]  R. Atalla,et al.  Nondegradative Preparation of Amorphous Cellulose , 1986 .

[30]  A. Sarko,et al.  Packing analysis of carbohydrates and polysaccharides. 16. The crystal structures of celluloses IVI and IVII , 1985 .

[31]  L. T. Fan,et al.  Major chemical and physical features of cellulosic materials as substrates for enzymatic hydrolysis , 1980 .

[32]  D. Mertens Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion. , 1977, Federation proceedings.