A novel evaluation of heat-electricity cost allocation in cogenerations based on entropy change method

As one of the most significant measures to improve energy utilization efficiency and save energy, cogeneration or combined heat and power (CHP) has been widely applied and promoted with positive motivations in many countries. A rational cost allocation model should indicate the performance of cogenerations and balance the benefits between electricity generation and heat production. Based on the second law of thermodynamics, the present paper proposes an entropy change method for cost allocation by choosing exhaust steam entropy as a datum point, and the new model works in conjunction with entropy change and irreversibility during energy conversion processes. The allocation ratios of heat cost with the present and existing methods are compared for different types of cogenerations. Results show that the allocation ratios with the entropy change method are more rational and the cost allocation model can make up some limitations involved in other approaches. The future energy policies and innovational directions for cogenerations and heat consumers should be developed.

[1]  Miguel A. Lozano,et al.  Theory of the exergetic cost , 1993 .

[2]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems — application to the CGAM problem , 1994 .

[3]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  The merit of cogeneration: Measuring and rewarding performance , 2008 .

[4]  Mohammed A.K. Al-Sofi,et al.  Fuel allocation in dual-purpose plants , 1995 .

[5]  Xue-min Ye,et al.  Reduced Exergy Method for Heat-Electricity Cost Allocation in Combined Heat and Power Plants , 2003, Entropy.

[6]  J. Sirchis Energy efficiency in industry , 1988 .

[7]  François Maréchal,et al.  Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typification in the context of CO2 abatement part II: Combined heat and power cogeneration , 2010 .

[8]  Noam Lior,et al.  Fuel allocation in a combined steam-injected gas turbine and thermal seawater desalination system , 2007 .

[9]  Xiao Feng,et al.  A new performance criterion for cogeneration system , 1998 .

[10]  Shahnaz Amiri,et al.  Internalising external costs of electricity and heat production in a municipal energy system , 2007 .

[11]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model , 2007 .

[12]  Christos A. Frangopoulos,et al.  Application of the thermoeconomic functional approach to the CGAM problem , 1994 .

[13]  D. J. Kim A new thermoeconomic methodology for energy systems , 2010 .

[14]  Aviel Verbruggen Qualifying Combined Heat and Power (CHP) activity , 2007 .

[15]  François Maréchal,et al.  Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typi!cation in the context of CO 2 abatement part I: Power generation , 2010 .

[16]  V. Badescu,et al.  Metamorphoses of cogeneration-based district heating in Romania: A case study , 2011 .

[17]  He Si Foreign CHP policies and prospects of small distributed CHP in China , 2003 .

[18]  Stefan Bouzarovski,et al.  Regulating district heating in Romania: Legislative challenges and energy efficiency barriers , 2010 .

[19]  Kari Alanne,et al.  Distributed energy generation and sustainable development , 2006 .

[20]  E. Conde Lázaro,et al.  Analysis of cogeneration in the present energy framework , 2006 .