The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale.
暂无分享,去创建一个
L Ploux | M. Giazzon | M. Liley | A. Popa | K. Anselme | L. Ploux | K Anselme | P Davidson | A M Popa | M Giazzon | M Liley | P. Davidson
[1] S. Hajati,et al. XPS imaging of depth profiles and amount of substance based on Tougaard’s algorithm , 2006 .
[2] Martin Bastmeyer,et al. Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.
[3] Klaus Affeld,et al. The effect of surface roughness on activation of the coagulation system and platelet adhesion in rotary blood pumps. , 2007, Artificial organs.
[4] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.
[5] C. Wilkinson,et al. New depths in cell behaviour: reactions of cells to nanotopography. , 1999, Biochemical Society symposium.
[6] B. Smets,et al. Surface physicochemical properties of Pseudomonas fluorescens and impact on adhesion and transport through porous media , 1999 .
[7] Duncan S Sutherland,et al. In vitro and in vivo response to nanotopographically-modified surfaces of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and polycaprolactone , 2006, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.
[8] Masahiro Ohshima,et al. Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[9] John C. Vickerman,et al. Surface analysis : the principal techniques , 2009 .
[10] A S G Curtis,et al. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.
[11] Lars Rasmusson,et al. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[12] Yang Cheng,et al. Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic , 2005 .
[13] A S G Curtis,et al. Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.
[14] Takeshi Ito,et al. Newly Developed Chemical Probes and Nano-Devices for Cellular Analysis , 2008, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.
[15] Julie Gold,et al. Protein Adsorption on Model Surfaces with Controlled Nanotopography and Chemistry , 2002 .
[16] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Use of nanotopography to study mechanotransduction in fibroblasts--methods and perspectives. , 2004, European journal of cell biology.
[17] Tejal A Desai,et al. Nanostructured antifouling poly(ethylene glycol) films for silicon-based microsystems. , 2005, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
[18] M. Hamilton,et al. Effects of Substratum Topography on Bacterial Adhesion. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.
[19] Ravi S Kane,et al. Nanobiotechnology: Protein‐Nanomaterial Interactions , 2007, Biotechnology progress.
[20] P. Smethurst,et al. Identification in Collagen Type I of an Integrin α2β1-binding Site Containing an Essential GER Sequence* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[21] L. Murr,et al. Cytotoxic effects of aggregated nanomaterials. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.
[22] A. Rutenberg,et al. Microbial response to surface microtopography: the role of metabolism in localized mineral dissolution , 2001 .
[23] T. Webster,et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[24] R. Bruce Lennox,et al. Patterned surfaces via self-assembly , 1999 .
[25] Yong Wang,et al. Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide). , 2005, Biomaterials.
[26] R G Richards,et al. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to different treated titanium surfaces , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[27] H. Solak,et al. Nanopatterns with biological functions. , 2006, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
[28] Maryam Tabrizian,et al. Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[29] H. Vaudry,et al. Proteomic comparison of outer membrane protein patterns of sessile and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells , 2005 .
[30] F. Bäckhed,et al. Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[31] R. Funk,et al. Effects of Different Titanium Alloys and Nanosize Surface Patterning on Adhesion, Differentiation, and Orientation of Osteoblast-Like Cells , 2005, Cells Tissues Organs.
[32] D. Campoccia,et al. Study of Staphylococcus Aureus Adhesion on a Novel Nanostructured Surface by Chemiluminometry , 2006, The International journal of artificial organs.
[33] Thomas J Webster,et al. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[34] Nancy L Allbritton,et al. CRITICAL REVIEW www.rsc.org/loc | Lab on a Chip Analysis of single mammalian cells on-chip , 2006 .
[35] Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al. Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells , 2003, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.
[36] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. , 2007, Current stem cell research & therapy.
[37] C. Michiels,et al. Role of bacterial cell surface structures in Escherichia coli biofilm formation. , 2005, Research in microbiology.
[38] L. Barnes,et al. Effect of Milk Proteins on Adhesion of Bacteria to Stainless Steel Surfaces , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[39] K. Anselme,et al. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[40] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Protein repellent properties of covalently attached PEG coatings on nanostructured SiO(2)-based interfaces. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[41] D. Grant,et al. The effect of surface chemistry and nanotopography of titanium nitride (TiN) films on 3T3-L1 fibroblasts. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[42] K E Healy,et al. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[43] F. Rossi,et al. Surface Functionalization and Patterning Techniques to Design Interfaces for Biomedical and Biosensor Applications , 2006 .
[44] R. Lennox,et al. Self-Assembled Masks for the Transfer of Nanometer-Scale Patterns into Surfaces: Characterization by AFM and LFM , 2002 .
[45] Nanostructured magnetizable materials that switch cells between life and death. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[46] R. Oreffo,et al. The interaction of human bone marrow cells with nanotopographical features in three dimensional constructs. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[47] L. Schlapbach,et al. Protein adsorption on topographically nanostructured titanium , 2001 .
[48] Song Xu,et al. Nanofabrication of self-assembled monolayers using scanning probe lithography. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.
[49] F. Stellacci,et al. Contact Printing Beyond Surface Roughness: Liquid Supramolecular Nanostamping , 2007 .
[50] K. Komvopoulos,et al. Differential regulation of endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton on low-density polyethylene by nanotopography and surface chemistry modification induced by argon plasma treatment. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[51] R. Kolter,et al. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili , 1998, Molecular microbiology.
[52] C. Wilkinson,et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.
[53] S. Ramakrishna,et al. A review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies , 2006, Nanotechnology.
[54] K J Stout,et al. Development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions , 2000 .
[55] Tejal A Desai,et al. The effect of TiO2 nanotubes on endothelial function and smooth muscle proliferation. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[56] X. F. Wang,et al. Nanoscale surface topography enhances cell adhesion and gene expression of madine darby canine kidney cells , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[57] W. Frey,et al. Nanopatterning of fibronectin and the influence of integrin clustering on endothelial cell spreading and proliferation. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[58] John D. Brooks,et al. Properties of the stainless steel substrate, influencing the adhesion of thermo-resistant streptococci , 2000 .
[59] M. Garcia-Parajo,et al. Selective Immobilization of Protein Clusters on Polymeric Nanocraters , 2006 .
[60] Patrik Schmuki,et al. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. , 2007, Nano letters.
[61] Ann-Sofie Andersson,et al. The effects of continuous and discontinuous groove edges on cell shape and alignment. , 2003, Experimental cell research.
[62] A. Curtis,et al. Human Fibroblast and Human Bone Marrow Cell Response to Lithographically Nanopatterned Adhesive Domains on Protein Rejecting Substrates , 2007, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.
[63] T. Desai,et al. Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[64] Benjamin M. Wu,et al. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[65] M. Nardin,et al. Quantitative and morphological analysis of biofilm formation on self-assembled monolayers. , 2007, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.
[66] S. Aota,et al. The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[67] D. Ingber. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.
[68] C. Murphy,et al. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[69] S. Ramakrishna,et al. Applications of polymer nanofibers in biomedicine and biotechnology , 2005, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.
[70] J. Spatz,et al. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.
[71] Gangyao Wen,et al. Effect of spreading solvents on Langmuir monolayers and Langmuir–Blodgett films of PS-b-P2VP , 2006 .
[72] Sarah Kim,et al. Nanomachining by colloidal lithography. , 2006, Small.
[73] B. Rezek,et al. Strong influence of hierarchically structured diamond nanotopography on adhesion of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal cells , 2009 .
[74] Gabriela Kalna,et al. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.
[75] Neil A. Anderson,et al. Nanoscale optical imaging of single-walled carbon nanotubes , 2006 .
[76] C. Murphy,et al. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[77] G. Forgacs. On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: an approach based on percolation. , 1995, Journal of cell science.
[78] C J Murphy,et al. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[79] R. Salvarezza,et al. Nano/microscale order affects the early stages of biofilm formation on metal surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[80] K. Otto,et al. Adhesion of Type 1-Fimbriated Escherichia coli to Abiotic Surfaces Leads to Altered Composition of Outer Membrane Proteins , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.
[81] Chad A Mirkin,et al. The evolution of dip-pen nanolithography. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.
[82] A S G Curtis,et al. Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[83] Hee‐Tae Jung,et al. Application of supramolecular nanostamping to the replication of DNA nanoarrays. , 2007, Nano letters.
[84] Jeen-Shang Lin,et al. Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. , 2007, Gene.
[85] S. Krishnamoorthy,et al. Tuning the Dimensions and Periodicities of Nanostructures Starting from the Same Polystyrene‐block‐poly(2‐vinylpyridine) Diblock Copolymer , 2006 .
[86] Byungkyu Kim,et al. Label-free, microfluidic separation and enrichment of human breast cancer cells by adhesion difference. , 2007, Lab on a chip.
[87] E. Amanatides,et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to He, He/O(2) plasma treated PET films and aged materials: contributions of surface free energy and shear rate. , 2008, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.
[88] Sungho Jin,et al. Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[89] E. Ivanova,et al. Differences in colonisation of five marine bacteria on two types of glass surfaces , 2009, Biofouling.
[90] M. Wood. Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[91] Matthew J. Dalby,et al. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[92] A. Kromka,et al. Study on cellular adhesion of human osteoblasts on nano‐structured diamond films , 2009 .
[93] Micro- and nanopatterned star poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) materials prepared by UV-based imprint lithography. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[94] Julie Gold,et al. Quantitative assessment of the response of primary derived human osteoblasts and macrophages to a range of nanotopography surfaces in a single culture model in vitro. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[95] J. Jansen,et al. Early spreading events of fibroblasts on microgrooved substrates. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[96] T. Webster,et al. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. , 2001, Tissue engineering.
[97] H. Kessler,et al. Cellular unbinding forces of initial adhesion processes on nanopatterned surfaces probed with magnetic tweezers. , 2006, Nano letters.
[98] Thomas J Webster,et al. Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[99] P. Campbell,et al. Variation in surface texture measurements. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.
[100] A S G Curtis,et al. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.
[101] P. Bagnaninchi,et al. The beta integrins and cytoskeletal nanoimprinting. , 2008, Experimental cell research.
[102] Marcus Textor,et al. A Novel Approach to Produce Protein Nanopatterns by Combining Nanoimprint Lithography and Molecular Self-Assembly , 2004 .
[103] J. Planell,et al. Focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy characterization of cell behavior on polymer micro-/nanopatterned substrates: a study of cell-substrate interactions. , 2008, Micron.
[104] R Geoff Richards,et al. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[105] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.
[106] E. Baker,et al. Pili in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria — structure, assembly and their role in disease , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[107] K. Nguyen,et al. Cellular and molecular responses of smooth muscle cells to surface nanotopography. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
[108] É. Bertrand,et al. Subcellular proteomics : from cell deconstruction to system reconstruction , 2007 .
[109] John Q. Trojanowski,et al. Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis: Implications for Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2004, Neurochemical Research.
[110] A. Curtis,et al. Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. , 2004, Experimental cell research.
[111] Janos Vörös,et al. Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[112] Roberto Kolter,et al. Biofilms: the matrix revisited. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.
[113] Sungho Jin,et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[114] Thomas J Webster,et al. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[115] Loïc J Blum,et al. Enzyme association with lipidic Langmuir-Blodgett films: interests and applications in nanobioscience. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.
[116] A. Curtis,et al. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[117] Kjeld Søballe,et al. In vivo study of the effect of RGD treatment on bone ongrowth on press-fit titanium alloy implants. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[118] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.
[119] Seeram Ramakrishna,et al. Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue‐specific extracellular matrix , 2006, Biotechnology journal.
[120] V. Shastri,et al. The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[121] Joshua C. Hansen,et al. Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.
[122] Tejal A Desai,et al. Fabrication and evaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblast culture. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[123] C. Kirkpatrick,et al. Functionality of endothelial cells on silk fibroin nets: comparative study of micro- and nanometric fibre size. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[124] W. Nisch,et al. Variation in contact guidance by human cells on a microstructured surface. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[125] Tejal A Desai,et al. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[126] T. Albrektsson,et al. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[127] Newell R Washburn,et al. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[128] The effect of surface chemistry and nanotopography of titanium nitride (TiN) films on primary hippocampal neurones. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[129] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. , 2008, Nano letters.
[130] Joachim P. Spatz,et al. Micellar Inorganic–Polymer Hybrid Systems—A Tool for Nanolithography , 1999 .
[131] T. Webster,et al. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[132] W. G. Characklis. Bioengineering report: Fouling biofilm development: A process analysis , 1981 .
[133] G. Whitesides,et al. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[134] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.
[135] J. Lannutti,et al. Nanotopographic control of cytoskeletal organization. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[136] Katsuhiko Ariga,et al. Immobilization of biomaterials to nano-assembled films (self-assembled monolayers, Langmuir-Blodgett films, and layer-by-layer assemblies) and their related functions. , 2006, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.
[137] L. Wick,et al. Influence of the Surface Topography of Stainless Steel on Bacterial Adhesion , 2002 .
[138] Thomas Jay Webster,et al. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[139] M. Ginsberg,et al. Arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid (RGD): a cell adhesion motif. , 1991, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[140] Wei Zhou,et al. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[141] Y. L. Jeyachandran,et al. Bacterial adhesion studies on titanium, titanium nitride and modified hydroxyapatite thin films , 2007 .
[142] A S G Curtis,et al. Morphological and microarray analysis of human fibroblasts cultured on nanocolumns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2005, European cells & materials.
[143] S. Baldelli,et al. Sum frequency generation microscopy of microcontact-printed mixed self-assembled monolayers. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[144] D. Ingber,et al. Mechanotransduction: All Signals Point to Cytoskeleton, Matrix, and Integrins , 2002, Science's STKE.
[145] T. Albrektsson,et al. Bone reaction to nano hydroxyapatite modified titanium implants placed in a gap-healing model. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[146] T. Webster,et al. The impact of diamond nanocrystallinity on osteoblast functions. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[147] G. Camussi,et al. Endothelization and adherence of leucocytes to nanostructured surfaces. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[148] Christian Eggeling,et al. Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[149] J. Costerton,et al. Introduction to biofilm. , 1999, International journal of antimicrobial agents.
[150] Matthew John Dalby,et al. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[151] R Geoff Richards,et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[152] S. Pan,et al. Vitamin E TPGS-emulsified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles for cardiovascular restenosis treatment. , 2007, Nanomedicine.
[153] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. , 2002, Biomaterials.
[154] Thomas J Webster,et al. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[155] R. Oreffo,et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[156] F. Kienberger,et al. A new, simple method for linking of antibodies to atomic force microscopy tips. , 2007, Bioconjugate chemistry.
[157] R. G. Richards,et al. Focal adhesion interactions with topographical structures: a novel method for immuno‐SEM labelling of focal adhesions in S‐phase cells , 2008, Journal of microscopy.
[158] Hywel Morgan,et al. Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns. , 2005, Nano letters.
[159] Sungho Jin,et al. Improved bone-forming functionality on diameter-controlled TiO(2) nanotube surface. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.
[160] Joshua R Porter,et al. Biodegradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanowires for bone tissue engineering applications. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[161] M. Ferrari,et al. Modulating cellular adhesion through nanotopography. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[162] Hsuan-Liang Liu,et al. Fibronectin modulates the morphology of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on nano-grooved substrates , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[163] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[164] D. Landolt,et al. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[165] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. , 2009, Soft matter.
[166] H. C. van der Mei,et al. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[167] Hung-Ta Wang,et al. The control of cell adhesion and viability by zinc oxide nanorods. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[168] J. Rossier,et al. Integrating whole transcriptome assays on a lab-on-a-chip for single cell gene profiling. , 2008, Lab on a chip.
[169] O. Soppera,et al. Opposite responses of cells and bacteria to micro/nanopatterned surfaces prepared by pulsed plasma polymerization and UV-irradiation. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[170] Bharat Bhushan,et al. Nanoscale adhesion, friction and wear studies of biomolecules on silicon based surfaces. , 2006, Acta biomaterialia.
[171] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[172] C. Siedlecki,et al. Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[173] E. Leite,et al. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.
[174] M. Koizumi,et al. Development of a high lateral resolution TOF-SIMS apparatus for single particle analysis , 2008 .
[175] Joanna Verran,et al. Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.
[176] N. Gadegaard,et al. 3D polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2006, Nanomedicine.
[177] Brendon M. Baker,et al. New directions in nanofibrous scaffolds for soft tissue engineering and regeneration , 2009, Expert review of medical devices.
[178] H. Imai,et al. Adhesion of osteoblast-like cells on nanostructured hydroxyapatite. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.
[179] Thomas J Webster,et al. Nanobiotechnology: implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications , 2004, Expert review of medical devices.
[180] A. Curtis,et al. Nonadhesive nanotopography: fibroblast response to poly(n-butyl methacrylate)-poly(styrene) demixed surface features. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[181] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Roughness characteristic length scales of micro-machined surfaces: A multi-scale modelling , 2007 .
[182] S. Coskun,et al. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis , 2007, Prenatal diagnosis.
[183] Tim H. Taminiau,et al. λ/4 Resonance of an Optical Monopole Antenna Probed by Single Molecule Fluorescence , 2007 .
[184] P. Milani,et al. Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[185] Joshua C. Hansen,et al. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[186] M. Dalby,et al. The effect of the RACK1 signalling protein on the regulation of cell adhesion and cell contact guidance on nanometric grooves. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[187] Matthew J Dalby,et al. The fibroblast response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[188] A. Curtis,et al. Tubes with Controllable Internal Nanotopography , 2004 .
[189] A Curtis,et al. Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.
[190] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[191] A Curtis,et al. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.
[192] M. Fletcher,et al. Effects of substratum wettability and molecular topography on the initial adhesion of bacteria to chemically defined substrata a b , 1997 .
[193] A. Nanci,et al. Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[194] Lydie Ploux,et al. Bacteria/Material Interfaces: Role of the Material and Cell Wall Properties , 2010 .
[195] D. Brunette,et al. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.
[196] J. Jansen,et al. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[197] K. Whitehead,et al. The effect of surface topography on the retention of microorganisms , 2006 .
[198] Cameron J Wilson,et al. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.
[199] J. Jansen,et al. Scanning electron microscopic, transmission electron microscopic, and confocal laser scanning microscopic observation of fibroblasts cultured on microgrooved surfaces of bulk titanium substrata. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[200] C. D. W. Wilkinson,et al. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[201] Maxence Bigerelle,et al. Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[202] David J. Whitehouse,et al. Handbook of Surface Metrology , 2023 .
[203] Marcus Textor,et al. An inverted microcontact printing method on topographically structured polystyrene chips for arrayed micro-3-D culturing of single cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[204] V. Truskett,et al. Trends in imprint lithography for biological applications. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.
[205] Christopher Cannizzaro,et al. Nanofabrication and microfabrication of functional materials for tissue engineering. , 2007, Tissue engineering.
[206] F. L. Yap,et al. Protein and cell micropatterning and its integration with micro/nanoparticles assembly. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.
[207] G. Leggett,et al. Influence of solvent environment and tip chemistry on the contact mechanics of tip-sample interactions in friction force microscopy of self-assembled monolayers of mercaptoundecanoic Acid and dodecanethiol. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[208] S. Affrossman,et al. Cell response to nano-islands produced by polymer demixing: a brief review. , 2004, IEE proceedings. Nanobiotechnology.
[209] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. , 2002, Experimental cell research.
[210] Kazuki Kurimoto,et al. Global single-cell cDNA amplification to provide a template for representative high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis , 2007, Nature Protocols.
[211] Y. L. Jeyachandran,et al. A study on bacterial attachment on titanium and hydroxyapatite based films , 2006 .
[212] Christopher J Murphy,et al. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[213] Urs P. Wild,et al. Fabricating arrays of single protein molecules on glass using microcontact printing , 2003 .
[214] D. McClay. The role of thin filopodia in motility and morphogenesis. , 1999, Experimental cell research.
[215] B. Logan,et al. Probing Bacterial Electrosteric Interactions Using Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .
[216] Patrik Schmuki,et al. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm--an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. , 2009, Small.
[217] A multi-scale approach of roughness measurements: Evaluation of the relevant scale , 2007 .
[218] H. C. van der Mei,et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of bacterial deposition to polyurethane coatings after conditioning film formation in the marine environment. , 2004, Microbiology.
[219] Antonio Nanci,et al. Surface Nanopatterning to Control Cell Growth , 2008 .
[220] Robert Langer,et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[221] A. Becker,et al. Systems nanobiology: from quantitative single molecule biophysics to microfluidic-based single cell analysis. , 2007, Sub-cellular biochemistry.
[222] S. Hanks,et al. Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. , 2006, Biophysical journal.
[223] C. Prigent-Combaret,et al. Abiotic Surface Sensing and Biofilm-Dependent Regulation of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.
[224] Tae Gwan Park,et al. Biomimicking extracellular matrix: cell adhesive RGD peptide modified electrospun poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofiber mesh. , 2006, Tissue engineering.
[225] Peter Gasteier,et al. Nanostructured Ordering of Fluorescent Markers and Single Proteins on Substrates , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.