Defending humankind: Anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art

[1]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Emotions, Simulation, and Abstract Art , 2021, Art and Perception.

[2]  Jean‐François Bonnefon,et al.  Bad machines corrupt good morals , 2021, Nature Human Behaviour.

[3]  Oleg Gorbaniuk,et al.  The structure and correlates of anthropocentrism as a psychological construct , 2021, Current Psychology.

[4]  Yi Bu,et al.  The Pace of Artificial Intelligence Innovations: Speed, Talent, and Trial-and-Error , 2020, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Preference for Human (vs. Robotic) Labor is Stronger in Symbolic Consumption Contexts , 2020, Journal of Consumer Psychology.

[6]  Z. Fayad,et al.  Artificial intelligence–enabled rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[7]  Antonio Rodà,et al.  Computational Creativity and Music Generation Systems: An Introduction to the State of the Art , 2020, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  Leonardo Arriagada,et al.  CG-Art: demystifying the anthropocentric bias of artistic creativity , 2020, Connect. Sci..

[9]  Hyoungsuk Lee,et al.  Compensating for the loss of human distinctiveness: The use of social creativity under Human-Machine comparisons , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Chelsea Batavia Is anthropocentrism really the problem? , 2020, Animal Sentience.

[11]  Bernd H. Schmitt Speciesism: an obstacle to AI and robot adoption , 2020 .

[12]  Florian Cova,et al.  An empirical investigation of guilty pleasures , 2019, Philosophical Psychology.

[13]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Psychological reactions to human versus robotic job replacement , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[14]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion , 2019, Journal of Marketing Research.

[15]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Towards transformational creation of novel songs , 2019, Connect. Sci..

[16]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[17]  Aaron Hertzmann,et al.  Can Computers Create Art? , 2018, ArXiv.

[18]  J. Prinz,et al.  Wonder, appreciation, and the value of art. , 2018, Progress in brain research.

[19]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art. , 2017 .

[20]  S. Loughnan,et al.  Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troublesome Behavior and Its Maintenance , 2017, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  Michael Eid,et al.  Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Stephen A. Spiller,et al.  On Consumer Beliefs about Quality and Taste , 2016 .

[24]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[25]  N. Epley,et al.  The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning , 2016 .

[26]  S. Loughnan,et al.  When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less , 2016 .

[27]  Abílio Oliveira,et al.  Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution , 2016 .

[28]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[29]  Berkeley J. Dietvorst,et al.  Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Eze Paez,et al.  Anthropocentrism and speciesism: conceptual and normative issues , 2014 .

[31]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[32]  P. Sol Hart,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Science Communication , 2012, Commun. Res..

[33]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression , 2012 .

[34]  John D. Coley,et al.  Common Origins of Diverse Misconceptions: Cognitive Principles and the Development of Biology Thinking , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[35]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier? , 2012, ECAI.

[36]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[37]  Javier DeFelipe,et al.  The Evolution of the Brain, the Human Nature of Cortical Circuits, and Intellectual Creativity , 2011, Front. Neuroanat..

[38]  Kyle E. Jennings Developing Creativity: Artificial Barriers in Artificial Intelligence , 2010, Minds and Machines.

[39]  D. Medin,et al.  Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Chapter 10 Motivated Moral Reasoning , 2009 .

[41]  David Glen Mick,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Consumer Creativity , 2008 .

[42]  Dacher Keltner,et al.  The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept , 2007 .

[43]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[44]  D. Keltner,et al.  Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion , 2003, Cognition & emotion.

[45]  Katherine V. Kortenkamp,et al.  Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas , 2001 .

[46]  R. Farr From Collective to Social Representations: Aller et Retour , 1998 .

[47]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[48]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.