Determinants of motor unit action potential duration

OBJECTIVE Motor unit action potential (MUAP) recordings are modeled by means of a single muscle fiber simulation program, to define two key subcomponents comprising the complete physiologic MUAP duration. A number of defining properties of these subcomponents are further developed. METHODS A single muscle fiber simulation program is utilized with various muscle fiber lengths and conduction velocities to generate near-field and far-field waveforms. RESULTS Two key subcomponents to the total physiologic single muscle fiber and hence MUAP duration are identified. One, defined as the near-field component, is directly dependent upon muscle fiber hemi-length. The other, defined as the far-field component, is independent of fiber length, but matches the internal action potential in duration. Both the near-field and far-field components are inversely dependent upon intracellular action potential conduction velocity. Additionally, temporal dispersion among the individual fibers contributing to a MUAP must be included in the overall MUAP duration calculation. CONCLUSIONS It is hoped that this approach to MUAP duration may allow a more complete appreciation of the components contributing to the MUAP, than permitted by the empirically derived values for MUAP duration presently under clinical use.

[1]  M. Naumann,et al.  Diagnostic value of in situ muscle fiber conduction velocity measurements in myopathies , 1996, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[2]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  Concentric needle recording characteristics related to depth of tissue penetration. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  E Stalberg,et al.  Propagation velocity in human muscle fibers in situ. , 1966, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  D. Rudman,et al.  High Rate of Fractures for Men in Nursing Homes , 1989, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Finite limb dimensions and finite muscle length in a model for the generation of electromyographic signals. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  L Arendt-Nielsen,et al.  Measurement of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity in Humans: Techniques and Applications , 1989, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[8]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  IMPULSE PROPAGATION IN STRIATED MUSCLE FIBERS AND THE ROLE OF THE INTERNAL CURRENTS IN ACTIVATION , 1959, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  D. Dumitru,et al.  Motor unit action potential components and physiologic duration , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  R. L. Linscheid,et al.  Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W. V. Macfarlane,et al.  Intracellular recording of action and after‐potentials of frog muscle between 0 and 45° C , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  R P Duke,et al.  Some investigations of the accuracy of knee joint kinematics. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Multielectrode study of the territory of a motor unit. , 1957, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  R. Lieber,et al.  Architectural design of the human intrinsic hand muscles. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  W S Pease,et al.  Motor Unit Analysis: Comparison between Concentric and Monopolar Electrodes , 1988, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[17]  R. Gruener,et al.  Conduction velocities in single fibers of diseased human muscle , 1979, Neurology.

[18]  W. Trojaborg,et al.  Quantitative electromyography in polymyositis: A reappraisal , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  L. Hammarström,et al.  AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF C14‐LABELLED ASCORBIC ACID AND DEHYDROASCORBIC ACID , 1966 .

[20]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Muscle fiber action potential changes and surface EMG: A simulation study. , 1992, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  J Kimura,et al.  Comparison of recording characteristics of monopolar and concentric needle electrodes. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Stegeman,et al.  A study of motor unit structure by means of scanning EMG , 1992, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Motor unit action potential duration recorded by monopolar and concentric needle electrodes. Physiologic implications. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[24]  H P Ludin,et al.  Microelectrode study of normal human skeletal muscle. , 1969, European neurology.

[25]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[26]  M J Zwarts,et al.  Muscle fiber conduction velocity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and traumatic lesions of the plexus brachialis. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  P. Brand,et al.  Relative tension and potential excursion of muscles in the forearm and hand. , 1981, The Journal of hand surgery.

[28]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  ACTION POTENTIAL PARAMETERS IN DIFFERENT HUMAN MUSCLES , 1955, Acta psychiatrica et neurologica Scandinavica.

[29]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology. , 1997, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  D L Jewett,et al.  Far‐field potentials , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[31]  N. Chino,et al.  Relationship between hypoxemia and fibrillation potential firing rate in denervated muscle , 1999, Muscle & nerve.

[32]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Volume conduction of the spike of the motor unit potential investigated with a new type of multielectrode. , 1957, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[33]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Concentric/monopolar needle electrode modeling: spatial recording territory and physiologic implications. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.