Anatomic Variation in Morphometry of Human Coracoid Process among Asian Population

Ethnic origin plays an important role in bone morphometry. Studies examining the influence of coracoid process have focused primarily on adults and have not included people from diverse Asian ethnic backgrounds. Our goal was to explore ethnic differences in morphometry of coracoid among Asian population. We performed morphometric measurements of coracoid process on cadaveric shoulders and shoulder CT scans from 118 specimens. The cadaveric sample included Indian (46%), Chinese (27%), and Myanmarese (27%) subjects, while the CT scans sample included Chinese (67%) and Malay (33%) subjects. The morphometric measurements were performed using digital caliper and software developed at Golden Horses Health Sanctuary (GHHS). In the Indian cadaveric shoulders, the coracoid process is better developed than the other groups with the exception of the tip width of coracoid process. There are significant differences in almost all measurements (P < 0.05) between the ethnic groups. On the other hand, the morphometry of coracoid process from CT scans data is bigger in Chinese than Malay subjects when stratified by sex (P < 0.05). Moreover, in all morphometric measurements, the females had smaller measurements than males (P < 0.05). Understanding such differences is important in anatomy, forensic and biological identity, and orthopaedic and shoulder surgeries.

[1]  G. M. Tan,et al.  Radiographic study of the proximal femur morphology of elderly patients with femoral neck fractures: is there a difference among ethnic groups? , 2017, Singapore medical journal.

[2]  G. Oladipo,et al.  Angle at the Medial Border: The Spinovertebra Angle and Its Significance , 2015, Anatomy research international.

[3]  W. A. N. El-Din,et al.  A Morphometric Study of the Patterns and Variations of the Acromion and Glenoid Cavity of the Scapulae in Egyptian Population. , 2015, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[4]  F. Othman,et al.  Easy, Fast and Accessible Dissecting Approach to Coracoid Process of Human Scapula. , 2015 .

[5]  Md. Golam Hossain,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Distal Femur: A Study of the Adult Malay Population , 2013, BioMed research international.

[6]  Sergio Silvestri,et al.  Stature estimation from scapular measurements by CT scan evaluation in an Italian population. , 2013, Legal medicine.

[7]  Pahuja Kavita,et al.  MORPHOLOGY OF CORACOID PROCESS AND GLENOID CAVITY IN ADULT HUMAN SCAPULAE , 2013 .

[8]  A. de Castro Pochini,et al.  Anatomic study of the coracoid process: safety margin and practical implications. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  S. Hollister,et al.  Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  M. Griesser,et al.  Prediction of coracoid thickness using a glenoid width-based model: implications for bone reconstruction procedures in chronic anterior shoulder instability. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  J. Murachovsky,et al.  Correlation of Coracoid Thickness and Glenoid Width , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  G. Athwal,et al.  An anatomic, computed tomographic assessment of the coracoid process with special reference to the congruent-arc latarjet procedure. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  M. Polguj,et al.  Correlation between morphometry of the suprascapular notch and anthropometric measurements of the scapula. , 2011, Folia morphologica.

[14]  S. Hariri,et al.  An anatomic study of the coracoid process as it relates to bone transfer procedures. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  J. Kelly,et al.  The relation of the coracoid process to the glenoid: an anatomic study. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[16]  P. Schöttle,et al.  The Coracoidal Insertion of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  J. D. de Beer,et al.  Coracoid process anatomy: Implications in radiographic imaging and surgery , 2007, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  R. Arciero,et al.  Anatomy of the Clavicle and Coracoid Process for Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  H. Fritts,et al.  Computed tomography analysis of the coracoid process and anatomic structures of the shoulder after arthroscopic coracoid decompression: a cadaveric study. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[20]  A. A. Ferreira Neto,et al.  An anatomical study of the subcoracoid space. , 2006, Clinics.

[21]  M. Sindel,et al.  Anatomical basics and variations of the scapula in Turkish adults. , 2006, Saudi medical journal.

[22]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Determinants of bone mass and bone size in a large cohort of physically active young adult men , 2006, Nutrition & metabolism.

[23]  I. Lo,et al.  Surgery about the coracoid: neurovascular structures at risk. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[24]  S. Gumina,et al.  The morphometry of the coracoid process – its aetiologic role in subcoracoid impingement syndrome , 1999, International Orthopaedics.

[25]  M. Gallino,et al.  Anthropometry of the scapula: clinical and surgical considerations. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.