The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Boyd. Research: A standard for policy-relevant science , 2013, Nature.
[2] T. Srinivasan. The Washington Consensus a Decade Later: Ideology and the Art and Science of Policy Advice , 2000 .
[3] C. Tyler. Wanted: academics wise to the needs of government. , 2017 .
[4] N. McGlynn. Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.
[5] Kevin Currie-Knight. Review of The knowledge illusion: Why we never think alone , 2017 .
[6] Matthew Wood,et al. The Politics of Co-Production: Risks, Limits and Pollution. , 2016 .
[7] J. Lloyd. Should academics be expected to change policy? Six reasons why it is unrealistic for research to drive policy change , 2016 .
[8] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. The adaptive toolbox. , 2001 .
[9] A. Boaz,et al. How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[10] Hilary Thomson,et al. Improving utility of evidence synthesis for healthy public policy: the three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]). , 2013, American journal of public health.
[11] J. Ward,et al. Evidence for close linkage of human amylase loci. , 1972, Nature: New biology.
[12] B. Jones,et al. Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .
[13] S. Chapman,et al. From "our world" to the "real world": Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers. , 2011, Social science & medicine.
[14] W. Sutherland,et al. Policy advice: Use experts wisely , 2015, Nature.
[15] D. Norse. The nitrogen cycle, scientific uncertainty and policy relevant science , 2005, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences.
[16] B. Latour,et al. The Whole World is Becoming Science Studies: Fadhila Mazanderani Talks with Bruno Latour , 2018, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society.
[17] Katherine E. Smith,et al. We Need to Talk about Impact: Why Social Policy Academics need to Engage with the UK's Research Impact Agenda , 2016, Journal of Social Policy.
[18] Meg Wiggins,et al. Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions: Three Recent U.K. Examples , 2003 .
[19] K. Oliver,et al. How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact? , 2018, Political Studies Review.
[20] P. John,et al. Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change? , 2003 .
[21] K. J. Sy. As Scientists and Citizens , 1989 .
[22] D. Gough,et al. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[23] Paul Cairney,et al. Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs , 2018, Practical Lessons from Policy Theories.
[24] S. Witter,et al. Embedded health service development and research: why and how to do it (a ten-stage guide) , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[25] David W. Cash,et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Michael D. Jones,et al. How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories? , 2017, Palgrave Communications.
[27] R. Nichols. Science and technology advice to government , 1988 .
[28] Heather Douglas. Weighing Complex Evidence in a Democratic Society , 2012, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.
[29] B. Crisp,et al. Theoretical reflections on the nexus between research, policy and practice , 2008 .
[30] N. Zahariadis. The Multiple Streams Framework , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.
[31] N. Stenseth,et al. Communication of Science Advice to Government. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[32] D. Koshland. Science advice to the president. , 1988, Science.
[33] I. Boyd,et al. How to increase the potential policy impact of environmental science research , 2015, Environmental Sciences Europe.
[34] T. Lorenc,et al. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.
[35] Cheryl Brumley. Academia and storytelling are not incompatible – how to reduce the risks and gain control of your research narrative. , 2014 .
[36] William G. Lang,et al. Report of the 2011-2012 Standing Committee on Advocacy: The Relevance of Excellent Research: Strategies for Impacting Public Policy , 2012, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.
[37] M. Petticrew,et al. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences , 2006 .
[38] Herman Aguinis,et al. Customer-Centric Science: Reporting Significant Research Results With Rigor, Relevance, and Practical Impact in Mind , 2010 .
[39] Wil Lepkowski. Heritage Foundation's Science Policy Advice for Reagan: Although latest study does not contain comprehensive discussion of science policy, it does give a conservative slant on many technical issues , 1984 .
[40] H. Davies,et al. Using Evidence: How research can inform public services , 2007 .
[41] Heather Douglas. Politics and Science , 2015 .
[42] M. G. Morgan,et al. Improving Science and Technology Advice for Congress , 2001, Science.
[43] Katherine E. Smith,et al. 'Black magic' and 'gold dust' : the epistemic and political uses of evidence tools in public health policy making , 2015 .
[44] David Saah,et al. So you want your research to be relevant? Building the bridge between ecosystem services research and practice , 2017 .
[45] A. Shestakov,et al. Toward strategic, coherent, policy-relevant arctic science , 2016, Science.
[46] P. Collins. The Politics of Scientific Advice: Quality control in scientific policy advice: the experience of the Royal Society , 2011 .
[47] P. Fafard. Beyond the usual suspects: using political science to enhance public health policy making , 2015, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
[48] Paul Cairney,et al. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making , 2016 .
[49] Andrew M. Rous,et al. Being relevant: Practical guidance for early career researchers interested in solving conservation problems , 2015 .
[50] Sandy Oliver,et al. Introducing Systematic Reviews , 2019, Conducting Systematic Reviews in Sport, Exercise, and Physical Activity.
[51] A. Boaz,et al. Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature , 2011, BMC Research Notes.
[52] S. Lavorel,et al. Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy , 2018, Ambio.
[53] F. de Vocht,et al. Defining ‘evidence’ in public health: a survey of policymakers’ uses and preferences , 2015, European journal of public health.
[54] C. Whitty. What makes an academic paper useful for health policy? , 2015, BMC Medicine.
[55] L. Locock,et al. Research, Policy and Practice – Worlds Apart? , 2004, Social Policy and Society.
[56] M. Schwartz,et al. Policy Relevant Conservation Science , 2015 .
[57] J. Knottnerus,et al. Methodology of the 'craft' of scientific advice for policy and practice. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[58] Irene Kwan,et al. Mediating policy-relevant evidence at speed: are systematic reviews of systematic reviews a useful approach? , 2015 .
[59] Tikki Pang,et al. Evidence for Health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice , 2016, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[60] R. Fernández. How to be a more effective environmental scientist in management and policy contexts , 2016 .
[61] Tanya Heikkila,et al. Comparison of Theories of the Policy Process , 2018 .
[62] Bryan D. Jones,et al. The cognitive underpinnings of policy process studies: Introduction to a special issue of Cognitive Systems Research , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.
[63] Frank R. Baumgartner,et al. Endogenous disjoint change , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.
[64] W. Fuller. The needs of the many... , 2010, The Florida nurse.
[65] John W. Kingdon. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .
[66] Giandomenico Majone,et al. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , 1989 .
[67] S. Jasanoff,et al. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .
[68] K. Oliver,et al. Reducing ambiguity to close the science-policy gap , 2018 .
[69] Michael Jones,et al. Narratives as tools for influencing policy change , 2018, Practical Lessons from Policy Theories.
[70] Anthony King. Science, politics and policymaking , 2016, EMBO reports.
[71] P. Cairney,et al. How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies , 2017, Palgrave Communications.
[72] M. Meyer,et al. An ecologist's guide to careers in science policy advising , 2018 .
[73] J. Tyndall. How low can you go? Towards a hierarchy of grey literature. , 2008 .
[74] R. Farmer. How to Influence Government Policy with Your Research: Tips from Practicing Political Scientists in Government , 2010, PS.
[75] A. Thompson,et al. What Is the Value of History in Policymaking , 2015 .
[76] K. Oliver,et al. Networks and network analysis in evidence, policy and practice , 2018, Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice.
[77] M. Hammersley. The Myth of Research-Based Policy and Practice , 2013 .
[78] D. Atkins,et al. Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice slips "twixt cup and lip". , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.
[79] D. Moher,et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network , 2010, BMC medicine.
[80] J. Lavis,et al. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? , 2003, The Milbank quarterly.
[81] M. Petticrew,et al. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .
[82] Sara K. Yeo,et al. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? , 2016, Public understanding of science.
[83] D. Edwards,et al. Reframing the evidence base for policy‐relevance to increase impact: a case study on forest fragmentation in the oil palm sector , 2017 .
[84] Clare Wilkinson,et al. Evidencing impact: a case study of UK academic perspectives on evidencing research impact , 2019 .
[85] N. Allum,et al. Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .
[86] E. Kerr,et al. Helping health service researchers and policy makers speak the same language. , 2015, Health services research.
[87] N. Pyenson,et al. How to Produce Translational Research to Guide Arctic Policy , 2017, BioScience.
[88] P. Cairney,et al. Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre , 2018, Palgrave Communications.
[89] J. Pielke. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .
[90] J. Burgess. Follow the argument where it leads: some personal reflections on ‘policy‐relevant’ research , 2005 .
[91] Elinor Ostrom,et al. Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: An Impossibility? , 2007 .
[92] M. Kohn. Darwin 200: The needs of the many , 2008, Nature.
[93] R. Cormier,et al. Censoring government scientists and the role of consensus in science advice , 2015, EMBO reports.
[94] M. Evans,et al. An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers , 2018, Palgrave Communications.
[95] E. Araral,et al. The institutional analysis and development framework , 2012 .
[96] David C Rose,et al. The case for policy-relevant conservation science , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[97] J. Haidt. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.
[98] A. Yadav. Knowledge Management Policy , 2011 .
[99] Christl A. Donnelly,et al. Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy , 2018, Nature.
[100] H. Simon,et al. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .
[101] Peter Gluckman,et al. Policy: The art of science advice to government , 2014, Nature.
[102] L. Locock,et al. Whose evidence is it anyway , 2015 .
[103] J. Parkhurst. The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence , 2016 .
[104] W. Sutherland. Review by quality not quantity for better policy , 2013, Nature.
[105] C. Weiss. The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .
[106] B. Head,et al. Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges , 2010 .