Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to EQ-5D weights

PurposeTo map health outcome related variables from a national register, not part of any validated instrument, with EQ-5D weights among stroke patients.MethodsWe used two cross-sectional data sets including patient characteristics, outcome variables and EQ-5D weights from the national Swedish stroke register. Three regression techniques were used on the estimation set (n = 272): ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, and censored least absolute deviation (CLAD). The regression coefficients for “dressing“, “toileting“, “mobility”, “mood”, “general health” and “proxy-responders” were applied to the validation set (n = 272), and the performance was analysed with mean absolute error (MAE) and mean square error (MSE).ResultsThe number of statistically significant coefficients varied by model, but all models generated consistent coefficients in terms of sign. Mean utility was underestimated in all models (least in OLS) and with lower variation (least in OLS) compared to the observed. The maximum attainable EQ-5D weight ranged from 0.90 (OLS) to 1.00 (Tobit and CLAD). Health states with utility weights <0.5 had greater errors than those with weights ≥0.5 (P < 0.01).ConclusionThis study indicates that it is possible to map non-validated health outcome measures from a stroke register into preference-based utilities to study the development of stroke care over time, and to compare with other conditions in terms of utility.

[1]  J. Passchier,et al.  Coping Strategies as Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: A Longitudinal Study , 2007, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[2]  J. Brazier,et al.  The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12 , 2004, Medical care.

[3]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[4]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Health Utilities Index , 2014 .

[5]  Leonie Segal,et al.  Comparing the Incomparable? A Systematic Review of Competing Techniques for Converting Descriptive Measures of Health Status into QALY-Weights , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  M. Weinstein,et al.  QALYs: the basics. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  D. Wild,et al.  Reimbursement agency requirements for health related quality-of-life data: a case study , 2009, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[8]  J. Starmark,et al.  The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. , 1988, Acta neurochirurgica.

[9]  F. J. Carod-Artal,et al.  Quality of Life after Stroke: The Importance of a Good Recovery , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[10]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[11]  R M Kaplan,et al.  A general health policy model: update and applications. , 1988, Health services research.

[12]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[13]  Oliver Rivero-Arias,et al.  Mapping the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Measurement into the Generic EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health Outcome , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  Aki Tsuchiya,et al.  A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures , 2010, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[15]  R. Hays,et al.  Commentary on using the SF-36 or MOS-HIV in studies of persons with HIV disease , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[16]  E. Long International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research , 2012 .

[17]  C. H. Slater,et al.  Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation , 1994 .

[18]  Ling-Hsiang Chuang,et al.  Converting the SF-12 into the EQ-5D , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[19]  Luis Prieto,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2005 .

[20]  J. Starmark,et al.  The Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85) , 1988, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[21]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  D. Feeny,et al.  Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  R. Teasell,et al.  Health-related quality of life after stroke: what are we measuring? , 2008, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[24]  E. Glader,et al.  Utility loss and indirect costs after stroke in Sweden , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[25]  K. Muir,et al.  Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores? , 2008, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[26]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Using Utility Measurements , 2006, Stroke.

[27]  Arne Lindgren,et al.  Determinants of Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers , 2005, Stroke.

[28]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[29]  C. Anderson,et al.  Protocol and Pilot Data for Establishing the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry , 2010, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[30]  G W Torrance,et al.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[31]  R. Osborne,et al.  The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of Health-Related Quality of Life , 1999, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Multi-Attribute Health Status Classification Systems , 1995, PharmacoEconomics.

[33]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After Stroke Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Using Utility Measurement , 2006 .

[34]  M. Koopmanschap,et al.  Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: The usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[35]  K. Stavem,et al.  Determinants of Change in Quality of Life from 1 to 6 Months following Acute Stroke , 2007, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[36]  R. O’Brien,et al.  A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors , 2007 .

[37]  日本脳卒中学会,et al.  Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association , 2007 .

[38]  P. Dolan,et al.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.

[39]  B. Norrving,et al.  The Riks-Stroke Story: Building a Sustainable National Register for Quality Assessment of Stroke Care , 2011, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.